Skip to main content

Full text of "NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 19750009012: Development of ultrasonic methods for hemodynamic measurements"

See other formats


i^^:S E :2 41235 ) DEVELOPMENT OF ULTBASONIC 
METHODS FOB HEHODT NAHIC MEASUREMENTS 

Progress Heport (Colorado State Dniv.) 

115 p HC $5.25 CSCL C6D 


G3/52 


N 75- 17084' 

Onclas 
10233 ) 


DEVELOPMENT OF ULTRASONIC METHODS FOR 


HEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS 


by 

M. B. HISTAND* C. W. MILLER* 

M. K. WELLS F. D. MCLEOD 
E. R. GREENE D. WINTER 

From the Departments of 

Mechanical Engineering and Physiology and Biophysics 

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY 
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80523 


A Semi-annual Progress Report Prepared for the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 


Under NASA GRANT NSG-2009 
February 1, 1975 


♦Principal Investigators 

i 



TABLE OF CONTENTS 


I. Introduction 

II. Volume Flow Measurement Technique 

III. Implant and Transcutaneous Velocity and Flow Comparisons 

IV. Half Power Diameter Measurements 

V. Wide Gate Full Vessel Illumination 

VI. Ultrasound Dosimetry 

VII. Spectral Analysis of Pulse Doppler Signals Using Sonograms 

VIII. Performance of the Pulsed Doppler Velocity Meter 

IX. Performance of the NASA-PUDVM 

X. Standard Test System 

XI. Bibliography 

XII. Appendix I 

XIII. Appendix II 



-3- 


I. Introduction 

This progress report summarizes the results of our research in 
diagnostic ultrasound conducted during August 1974 - January 1975. 

The major items to which the report will be addressed are: 

A. Based on state of the art Doppler ultrasound instrumentation, 
a transcutaneous method to measure instantaneous mean blood flow in 
peripheral arteries of man is defined. Problems toward which further 
research will be directed prior to construction of the final instrumen- 
tation package are discussed. 

B. A detailed evaluation of transcutaneous and implanted cuff 
ultrasound velocity measurements was completed. Using our conventional 
narrow gate scan with the PUDVM the accuracies of velocity, flow, and 
diameter measurements were assessed for steady fiow in rigid tubes, 
bovine carotid segments, dialysis tubing, and for pulsatile flow, in 
anesthetized dogs. 

C. The analysis of the backscattered power was undertaken to 
determine the accuracy of transmural diameter measurements by the half 
power method. 

D. The wide gate-full illumination method of measuring instantaneous 
mean velocity was assessed in steady flow for the dialysis tube and for 
pulsatile flow in the dog. 

£. The performance criteria of the PUDVM were described, A 
spectrum analyzer and FFT digital program were used to examine the 
spectral characteristics of the Doppler signals as a function of 
Reynold's number. 

F. The performance of the NASA-PUDVM was assessed. 

G. A standard transducer test system was designed and evaluated. 

PRECEDING PAGE BLANK NOT ITLME0 



- 4 - 


H. Ultrasound dosimetry procedures were investigated. 

I. Spectral analysis of the PUDVM signals was performed 


using a sonogram. 



-5- 


II. Volume Flow Measurement Technique 

The primary objective of this research project is the definition 
and preliminary evaluation of a transcutaneous method for the measurement 
of instantaneous mean flow in the peripheral arteries of an animal 
or human. The effort is directed toward the eventual development of 
ultrasound instrumentation that can be easily applied for the quantitative 
measurement of flow in a subcutaneous vessel. State of the art 
instrumentation is used. With an emphasis for the method based on 
ease of application and accuracy, we have examined the various possibilities 
using state of the art Doppler instrumentation to accomplish this goal. 

The theoretical analysis of resolution, methodology, and three methods 
for volume flow measurement were described in the progress report 
submitted in July, 1974. Based upon this report and further developmental 
studies both in simulated blood flow systems (steady flow in dialysis tubes) 
and in special animal preparations (chronic implantation of flow cuffs), 
we have defined a method based upon current state of the art instrumen- 
tation for the measurement of mean flow. 

A. Uniform illumination method 

Mean instanteous flow will be computed from the product of the 
mean instantaneous velocity obtained from the first moment of the Doppler 
power spectrum from a wide gate encompassing the entire vessel diameter 
and the cross-sectional area obtained from a half power diameter 
measurement. The method will combine the measurement of instantaneous 
mean velocity using a piezoelectric crystal larger than the vessel 
diameter which will uniformly illuminate the cross-section of the 
vessel at a specific location with a PUDVM gate opened to enclose the 
near wall and far wall. Coupled with this measurement the geometry 



- 6 - 


of the vessel will be obtained from a small crystal, narrow gate PUDVM 
scan to obtain the half power points and thus the vessel diameter. 

We ultimately envision a digital display of the computed flow. 

An important facet of the method is the design of a transducer 
which can be easily positioned on the skin for Doppler angle determination 
and velocity measurement. Our preliminary design is shown in Figure 1. 
Rectangular piezoelectric crystals will be placed at (1), (2), (3), (4), 
(5) permitting angle determinations at a variety of depths (shown). By 
rotating the transducer about its axis and using e.g. crystal (1) as 
a transmitter and crystal (2) as a receiver the returned signal can be 
nulled and thus the normal to the flow axis determined. In the dialysis 
flow system the accuracy is ± .5°. The design of the holder will be 
based upon the movable protractor designs we have developed for trans- 
cutaneous narrow gate scans. The transducer will be positioned by 
audio recognition of the signal. 

We have carefully examined the wide gate method for determining 
mean velocity and are convinced the accuracy is high for Reynolds 
numbers above 1500. Further study of flow in the laminar region 
(parabolic profiles) is to be conducted. See Section IV. In addition, 
the power scan method (Section III) has proven to be an effective 
means for measuring diameter on the dialysis tube although we have 
problems resolving the far wall in the animal. Since some discrepancies 
exist in measuring diameter by the half power method we will devote a 
major effort to perfect this method. Low pass filtering will be tried 
as an alternative to locate the walls. 




- 8 - 


III. Implant and Transcutaneous Velocity and Flow Comparisons 

Detailed tests have been conducted on dialysis, rigid tube, and 
bovine carotid arterial simulation systems. In these systems the 
conventional narrow gate scan method that has been utilized in our 
laboratory for the last two years was carefully evaluated. Although 
errors exist in volume flow calculation by the narrow gate method, 
this method can serve as a means of evaluating the correlation between 
transcutaneous flow measurements and those made with a cuff implanted 
on the vessel. Since we are seeking an accurate and simple method 
to measure mean flow, we have not assessed corrections for boundary 
errors and truncation as discussed in the previous report. We plan 
to look at these errors during 1975. 

A. Narrow gate fluid system experiments 
Narrow gate scan flow measurements were taken in three types 
of vessels: rigid tube, bovine graft, and dialysis tubing. Data 

presented in Tables 1 and 2 were taken only under the following 
instrument settings and experimental procedures. 

Instrument Setting 

PUDVM #2 

PW 8 cycles 

PR 2 (nominally 20 kc) 


Gate 1 psec 

Transducer #116 2.8 mm crystal 

All data was recorded on magnetic tape, digitized and processed 
by the digital computer. Since the flow system was steady (nonpulsatile) , 
the peak and average values were similar. The average values were compared 
to collection measurements for the rigid tube and bovine graft systems. 



-9- 


TABLE 1 


Flowrate Measured (Q m ) vs. Flowrate PUDVM (Qpg ) 


Type Vessel Dimensions 

Re 

Qm cc/sec 

Qpncc/sec 

Avg. 

. Erjor 

Rigid Tube ll.Onm ID 

740 

6.50 

3.51 


- 45 

13.0mm 00 

800 

7.00 

3.88 


-44 

crystal/ID ratio .255 

1030 

9.00 

5.71 


- 37 


1150 

10.00 

6.80 


-32 


1320 

11.50 

7.42 

8.09 

— 30 




8.68 






7.84 






8.42 




1490 

13.00 

11.85 


- 8 


1600 

14.65 

13.47 

13.06 

- 10 




12.65 




1830 

16.00 

12.79 
17.92 : 

15.36 

- 4 


2290 

20.00 

19.05 


-5 

* 

2600 

22.70 

25.68 

22.99 

24.34 

+ 7 


2860 

25.00 

23.14 


- 7 


3040 

26.20 

25.62 

25.07 

* 4 




- 24.52 




3600 

31.40 

33.56 


+ 7 


5200 

45.80 

41.67 

44.09 

42.88 

- 6 


7500 

65.40 

82.23 

79.46 

80.84 

+ 27 

Bovine Graft 7.7mm ID 

2500 

15.00 

14.77 

14.88 

14.82 

- 1 

10.0mm OD 

5000 

30.00 

32. 55 

32.38 

+ 8 

crystal/ID ratio .365 



33.31 

33.05 

30.63 




5800 

35.00 

29.95 

31.37 

30.66 

- 12 


-iq- 

table 2 


Type Vessel Dimensions 

Dialysis Tubing 6.3 nra 10 

crystal/IO ratio .455 


7.2 mm ID 

crystal/ID ratio .390 


Re 



Avg. 

I 

1000 

4.73 

3.38 

3.68 

3.53 

- 34 

1500 

7.10 

4.68 

4.56 

4.62 

-35 

2000 

9.46 

7.08 

7.66 

7.32 

-23 

2500 

11.83 

8.52 

9.02 

8.77 

- 25 

3000 

14.19 

13.32 

14.00 

13.66 

- 4 

3500 

16.56 

13.77 

15.26 

14.52 

- 12 

4000 

18.92 

14.82 

16.10 

15.46 

- IB 

4500 

21.30 

16.91 

17.86 

17.39 

- 16 

5000 

23.60 

17.16 

19.55 

18.36 

- 22 

1000 

5.65 

3.42 

3.72 

3.57 

- 37 

1500 

8.48 

8.48 

8.48 

6.12 

5.48 

6.30 

6.37 

6.14 

6.53 

6.16 

- 27 

2000 

11.30 

7.82 

8.33 

8.07 

- 28 . 

2500 

14.13 

10.05 

12.15 

11.10 

- 21 

3000 

16.80 

16.80 

15.76 

15.98 

16.02 

16.80 

16.14 

- 4 

3500 

19.80 

16.00 

18.70 

18.35 

- 7 

4000 

i 

22.60 

20.95 

20.98 

20.97 

- 7 

4500 

25.40 

22.34 

22.88 1 > 

22.51 - 

' 11 

5000 

28.35 

23.34 

24.25 

23.80 - 16 


i 


- 11 - 


A rotometer (± 5 % calibration to collection) was used as a standard 
during the dialysis tube study. The comparisons would help determine 
the ability of the narrow gate scan and developed velocity profile 
integration technique for flow rate determination. 

Results from the tables suggest the following: 

a. Standard and Doppler flow rates compare optimally only within 
certain observed Reynolds number values for each vessel type. 

Re 1500-5000 rigid tube 

Re 3000-4500 7.2 dialysis tubing 

Re 3000-4500 6.3 dialysis tubing 

Re <2500 -5000 Bovine graft 

b. As the tubing diameter increases (crystal diameter/ID ratio 
decreases) flow rates obtained from the PUDVM approach the standard 
values; within 101. 

c. Flow rates determined by the PUDVM for flow regimes of 
relatively low Re value (<2000) greatly differ from collection or 
rotometer values. 

B. Narrow gate comparisons of velocity and flow in the dog 

We have conducted extensive tests to compare the measured velocity 
and flow parameters obtained on subcutaneous arteries using implanted 
Doppler ultrasonic cuffs and transcutaneous probes. The dog was 
surgically implanted with ultrasonic cuffs on the right and left femoral 
arteries, the abdominal aorta, and the carotid artery. The carotid 
artery was surgically exteriorized for ease of transcutaneous recording. 
Post mortum exam will indicate whether the artery under these circum- 
stances is straight and uniform. Generally, we find that the trans- 
cutaneous and cuff narrow gate velocity and flow scans compare favorably 
when the Doppler angle is obtained accurately. Table 3 summarizes the 



- 12 - 


TABLE 3 


Narrow gate measurements of diameter, flow and velocity 
transcutaneous and cuff 



TYPE 

NASA DOG 15689 
XCUT vs. CUFF 
Right Carotid 

NUMBER OF 
SAMPLES 

DIA mm 

Diameter 

Xcut 

N=7 

4.18±.03, 

4.20±.10* 

(mm) 

Cuff 

N=ll 

Average Flow 

(cm 3 s J ) 

Xcut 

N=4 

2 .62+. 02 , 
2.58±.1(T 


Cuff 

N=5 


Cuff 

N=5 

2.96±.09 


Xcut 

N=2 

2.37±.00 

PEAK 

Xcut 

N=4 

112.5±10.1 

\ . 
(cms J ) 

Cuff 

N=5 

107. 8± 7.2 

Cuff 

N=6 

75.U22.3 

Xcut 

N=5 

91.1±10.7 

Notes: PD #2 

Cuff 

ID 5.0 mm crystal 2.5 mm 



PW 8 Xcut Xducer crystal 2.8 mm 

PRF 2,3 All data taken during anesthetic 
Gate 1 ysec RMS reading 0.15 V 


All H.R. 


102<HR<128 

128<HR<137 
141 <HR<143 

102<HR<128 

128<HR<137 
141 <HR<143 


For delays of 1 ysec or .5 ysec the data is similar 


-13- 


results of the experiments with the animal. We will concentrate on 
measurements from the right carotid artery although recordings from 
the abdominal and femoral arteries confirm what we have found on this 
particular artery. For heart rates in the range of 100 to 130 the 
centerline peak velocity measured with the PUDVM for the transcutaneous 
and the implanted cuff compares within the first standard deviation. 
Normally, the centerline peak velocities are approximately 100 cm/sec 
and we see for averages of approximately 5 experiments that the transcu- 
taneous value was 112 and the value measured with the implanted 
cuff at a location 1cm proximal to the transcutaneous measurements 
location was 107 cm/second. As the heart rate increases there is 
greater variability both In the waveforms and the resulting velocity 
values for cuff and the transcutaneous method. By integrating the 
velocity profiles, one can obtain the average flow, and again for 
a heart rate of 100 to 130 per second the average flow for the 
transcutaneous was 2.62 and for the cuff 2.58 cm 3 /sec showing good 
agreement between the two methods. For higher heart rates there is 
more divergence in the measurements made with the two methods. 

Finally, the diameters calculated from velocity profiles show very 
close agreement for the transcutaneous and the implanted cuff. Diameters 
at the specific locations were approximately 4,2 mm. 

The purpose of these experiments was to compare the two methods. 

We are not implying that the narrow gate method is the most accurate 
means of measuring diameter, flow or centerline peak velocity. However, 
these studies do demonstrate the high degree of correlation between 
transcutaneous measurements and implanted cuff measurements; necessary 
criteria for supporting our contention that transcutaneous measurements 



-14- 


of velocity and flow can be obtained with a high degree of accuracy. 

Figures 2, 3, 4, show the velocity waveforms, velocity profiles, 
and average flow waveforms from the implanted cuff on the carotid 
artery. Figures 5, 6, 7 show comparable data obtained with a 2.8 mm 
transcutaneous probe positioned 1 cm distal to the cuff. 


x 



PEAK AVC 



VELOCITY set NO. 8 
NASA DOG 
15689 
11-22-74 
ANES POTX 2.5 
CUFF YB CAR 2.5MM 


(Jl 

t 



1 1 

i 1 i 1 i 

> 1 i 

i t i 

j 

« 

• 

« 

» 

• 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

m 

o> 

in 

o 

in 

o 

ho 

^3 

*^3 

in 

in 

CO 


ULLISECONOS 


RECORDED FROM THE 



distance: IN MM 

FIGURE 3, PEAK FORWARD, AVERAGE AND PEAK REVERSE PROFILES 
RECORDED FROM THE CUFF. 







FIGURE 4. AVERAGE FLOW RECORDED WITH ThE CUFF. 







velocity in cm/sec 


120 . 


PEAK AVC. VELOCITY SET NO. 14 

\ NASA DOG 

15689 
11-22-74 
ANES POTX 2.5 
XCUT CAR MBH 


- 10 . 


TIME IN MILLISECONDS 




DATA AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2 EXCEPT RECORDED 
TRANSCUTANEOUSLY. NOTE HIGH DEGREE OF CORRELATION WITH 
FIGURE 2. 





distance in mm 

FIGURE 6. TRANSCUTANEOUS VELOCITY PROFILE. COMPARE WITH 
FIGURE 3. 




o 

o 

NO 


£ IN MILL IS 
>US MEAN FLOI 










- 21 - 


IV, Half Power Diameter Measurements 

We propose that the geometry (diameter) of the blood vessel can 
be accurately measured by a power scan with a small >.50R transducer . 

The first approach to the assessment of this method involves half 
power measurements of diameter on dialysis tubes of known diameter. 
Results are summarized in Table 4. 

A. Dialysis Tube Results 

For a 7.7 mm tube measured diameters were ~ 7.5 mm with a 2>8 mm 

crysta1 & = -36 ) and 7-65 with a 5-5 mm crystal ^O iEu Fe ~ = ' 71 ^ 
These errors would reduce the true volume flow measurement by ~ 10%. 

Figure 8 displays a power scan of the dialysis tube. For vessels of 
' 4 mm diameter or less problems arise: the half power diameters 

are approximately 25% too small presumedly due to the curvature of the 
vessel and the large crystal. This is inconsistent with the half 
power measurements made with 5-8 mm crystals which result in a 10% 
over estimate of diameter in a 7 mm tube. We are currently trying 
to resolve this problem by considering low pass filtering of the audio 
spectrum. Therefore, a more detailed and systematic approach will 
be taken. Our conclusion is that the half power method is the simplest 
and most accurate method for transcutaneous diameter determination 
for vessels whose diameter is > 7 mm. 

B. Reiteration of errors in half power measurements 
Ambiguity in finding the half power points is limited by four 

factors: 

1) Ambient Noise . The quality of the power scan is affected 
by the Doppler signal to noise ratio (S/N). Both base line shifts 
and signal variance are present with poor S/N. In practice this is not 



- 22 - 


a problem, however, when S/N ratios on the order of 20 to 50 dB 
are obtained. 

2) Wall motion and wall motion "noise." Wall motion tends to 
"blur" the wall location during the power scan, thus a mean diameter 

is obtained. While the "blurring" is reduced by multichannel operation 
it is not completely eliminated because of the finite integration 
time required to measure the signal power (Rayleigh signal statistics 
and fading must be integrated out). Large amplitude low frequency 
echoes from the wall are another wall motion problem. These echoes 
tend to distort the sample function near the wall and make it appear 
compressed. This problem is reduced by high pass filtering to 
eliminate the echoes. Alternately, low pass filtering can be used to 
select or enhance the wall echo and provide an impulse response at 
the wall. We plan to examine the latter to determine its accuracy 
in the diameter estimation. 

3) Range attenuation . The Doppler signal power falls off as 
a function of range, tending to obscure the step function endpoint. 

This difficulty can be eliminated either by range gain compensation, 
proper transducer design, or graphical correction of the power scan 
record. See actual data from dog experiments. 

4) A fourth and perhaps minor limitation is vessel curvature at 
the wall. The step function concept was developed for a plane or 
nearly flat surface, however, a vessel wall is a curved surface. 

This curvature A, is easily shown to be 



where a is the transducer beam diameter and r is the vessel radius. 
Evaluation of this for a transducer diameter of .25r leads to a 



-23- 


curvature of less than 1%. 

Combination of the above limitations leads to an experimental 
wall location error on the order of 1/4 sample function length and 
a diameter error on the order of times the sample function 
length. In practical terms the sample function length is on the 
order of 1 mm, thus vessel diameter measurement is on the order of 
± .44 mm. Although seemingly precise, this is still a 10% error on 
a 4 mm vessel . 

C. Half Power measurements on blood vessels 

Using implanted cuffs and transcutaneous probes we have recorded 
rms power scans on the abdominal aorta and carotid arteries. Consistent 
with our findings in the dialysis tube, the abdominal aorta values are 
accurate but the carotid diameters appear ~ 25% too small. Figure 9 
exhibits power scans for the abdominal aorta. Note the range attenuation 
which necessitates interpolating a half power point at the far wall. 
Transcutaneous measurements produce significant power fluctuations 
at the far wall (wall motion} which may obscure the half power points. 

Low pass filtering may alleviate this problem. Figure 10 exhibits 
power scans for the carotid artery producing diameters of ~ 3.45 mm 
which we believe to be too small. Our previous measurements of 
carotid inside diameters by surgical exposure result in values of 
- 4 mm. Therefore, we must be cautious in using the half power method 
of diameter determination In vessels less than 7 mm in diameter. 

Table 5 exhibits data on half power diameters for the carotid 
and abdominal aorta. The diameters for the carotid should be - 4 mm. 

The diameter for the abdominal aorta is quite close to the expected 


value. 



-24- 


TABLE 4 


Half Power Diameter Measurement 


TRANSDUCER 


i 

Dialysis Tube 
DIAMETERS (MM) 

RATIO OF CRYSTAL DIAMETER 
TO VESSEL DIAMETER 

#116-EC65 


7.47 

7.55 7.47 

.36 

2.8 mm 

LTZ 5 
5.5 mm 


7.55 

7.71 

.71 

LTZ 5 
8.0 mm 


8.20 8.61 8.60 
(7 . 88( Rel 500) ) 

1.03 

EC65 


8.69 

8.70 

.71 

5.5 mm 

EC65 


8.69 

8.53 8,93 

1.03 

8.0 m 

Notes: 

PD #2 
PW8 
PRF 2 
Gate 1 

ysec 

Tubing OD 7.8 mm 
Tubing ID 7.7 mm 

Re 3000 



i 




OTSI 9V 





















-28- 


TABLE 5 

1/2 Power Diameters 
NASA DOG 15689 

RATIO OF CRYSTAL DIAMETER 



TRANSDUCER 

TO VESSEL DIAMETER 

TECHNIQUE 

DIAMETERS 

RT CAR 

#116 

.73 

Xcut 

2.40 

RT CAR 

NASA 
LTZ 5.5 

1.44 

Xcut 

2.65 

RT CAR 

NASA 
LTZ 7.0 

1.84 

Xcut 

2.00 2.40 

RT CAR 

R. C. Cuff 

.65 

Potx 5.0 

2.60 


YB 2.5 


Cuff 


RT CAR 

R. C. Cuff 

.65 

Potx 2.5 

2.70 


YB 2.5 


Cuff 

2.70 2.65 

Notes : 

PD#2 

RMS .15 V 

Vessel Diam Assumed 3.8 mm ID 


PW8 Delay At 1/2 usee, 1 psec 

PRF 2.3 
Gate 1 ysec 


C=1 . 5x105 cm/sec 



-29- 


V. Wide Gate Full Vessel Illumination 

A rectangular 2 mm by 10 mm transducer was fabricated from LTZ 2 
to assess to accuracy of the wide gate full illumination method to 
measure mean velocity in a vessel. Presently, the zero crosser 
has been used for signal processing although we calculate an error 
as great as 15% may occur in determining the first moment of the 
power spectrum. Our preliminary findings in the dialysis tube steady 
flow system are quite encouraging. As shown in Table 6, we have 
obtained results with large circular crystals and two different large 
rectangular crystals, one of LTZ 5 and one of LTZ 2. By far the best 
results are obtained with the LTZ 2 indicating errors in measurement 
of the mean velocity in the range of Reynolds number from 2000 to 
5000 are less than 7%. At the very low Reynolds numbers larger errors 
occur which merit further investigation. We cannot adequately explain 
the reason that larger errors occur with certain piezoelectric 
materials, and further investigation is going to be conducted in 
transducer design and fabrication in order to optimize the results. 
Figures 11 » 12, and 13 exhibit the power spectra obtained with the 
LTZ 2 wide gate transducer. For a wide gate measurement one would 
expect a nearly rectangular power spectrum and we are obtaining very 
close approximations to that under these circumstances. We find also 
that the zero crosser is a much better than expected signal processor 
for signals using these spectra implying that more sophisticated 
signal processing may not be necessary. However, we plan to further 
investigate the use of first moment and zero crosser offset processing 
of these signals to see if the accuracy can be further improved. 




-30- 


TABLE 6 


COMPARISON V pD vs. Vm fn(Re) 

TRANSDUCER NASA LTZ 8.0 mm 
NASA EC65 8.0 mm 
NASA LTZ 5 


Re Vp D (cm/sec) Vm (cm/sec) % difference from standard 



(i) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(2) 

(1) 

(i) 

(2) 

(3) 

1000 

15.72 

17.3 

18.6 

18.5 

13.42 

13.16 

19 

28.9 

38.6 

1500 

22.26 

25.1 

28.2 

26.0 

20.14 

19.74 

13 

24.6 

40.0 

2000 

28.16 

30.9 

36.7 

31.1 

26.83 

26.32 

7 

15.2 

36.8 

2500 

33.31 

36.9 

42.2 

34.5 

33.55 

32.90 

1 

10.0 

25.8 

3000 

40.22 

42.7 

47.7 

40.5 

40.25 

39.48 

1 

6.1 

18.5 

3500 

45.75 

48.5 

55.1 

45.5 

46.97 

46.06 

-1 

3.2 

17.3 

4000 

51.48 

53.9 

61.2 

50.0 

53.69 

52.64 

-2 

0.4 

13.9 

4500 

56.45 

60,0 

67.3 

57.1 

60.40 

59.22 

-5 

0.7 

11.4 

5000 

61.58 

65.8' 

73.4 

61.7 

67.10 

65.80 

-7 

1.9 

09.4 


Full Vessel Ilium 

(i) 

NASA LTZ 2 rectangle (2 mm X 10 mm) 

PW8 

(2) 

NASA LTZ 8.00 mm 21 Jan (circular) 

PD2 

(3) 

NASA EC65 8.00 mm 23 Jan (circular) 

PR2 

GN1.0 

Gate 18.0 psec 

(4) 

NASA LTZ 5 rectangle (2 mm X 10 mm) 

Power ,15V 
Delay 8 usee 
7.5 mm dialysis 

. 




























-34- 


VI. Ultrasound Dosimetry 

Preliminary efforts have been made to document the power 
levels emitted by the pulsed ultrasonic Doppler velocity detector. 
The first experiment was conducted at the Colorado Medical Center 
in Dr. Paul Carson's laboratory (February 14, 1975). The setup 
consisted of determining the force exerted by the emitted pulse 
upon a highly absorbable buffer plate (SOAB). This force was 
determined using an electro-balance (Cahn). The initial results 
indicate that the pulse Doppler when operated at the highest 
pulse repetition rate (40kc) and longest pulse width (16 cycles) 
emits a sound beam which averages a power level of 296 MW/CM 2 . 

In these studies a 2,8 mm circular transducer was employed. 

If a 25 % insertion factor is assumed for tissue, the result is 
a power level of approximately 75 MW/ CM 2 . Peak intensity equals 
4.9 W/CM 2 . More work is planned in the future to document the 
power levels emitted by such devices as the pulsed ultrasonic 
Doppler velocity detector. We feel that intelligent use of 
ultrasonic flowmeters demands that continual knowledge of the ultra- 
sound dosage be at hand. 



-35- 


VII. Spectral Analysis of Pulse Doppler Signals Using Sonograms 
In an attempt to find the best method for determining the 
average blood flow rate in an artery, we have performed analyses 
of the Doppler shifted signal using sonograms. The data display 
consists of the time varying audio signal displayed at varying 
levels of amplitude {each different intensity of the contour 
represents a 6 db change). This technique permits display of 
the spectral patterns of the signal and from the graph, the various 
velocity components within the return Doppler shifted signal are 
easily viewed. 

This report will present the initial results using this 
technique and will suggest future directions. Sonograms were 
made for the Doppler shifted signals from an implanted flow cuff 
around the abdominal aorta of a dog (2.8 mm transducer). Two 
types of sonograms were made from the Doppler shifted signal at 
locations across the flow stream by approximate range gating and 
by using a wide gate which encompassed the entire flow stream. 

These results will be compared with the zero crosser output 
(wide gate, scan, and computer calculated). 

Figure 13A depicts a sonogram showing the Doppler shifted 
information received with a wide gate. The peak velocity recorded 
across the flow stream is approximately 101 cm/sec if the lowest 
amplitude signal is used. By selecting velocity components of 
higher contour intensities (continuous contours) values of 94 and 
91 cm/sec result. The entire velocity data for all combinations 
are shown in Table 7. 


-36- 


TABLE 7 


Blood velocity values (cm/sec) measured using wide and narrow gate 
pulse Doppler options on the abdominal aorta of a dog. 


Wide Gate 


Zero Crosser 

V Peak V 

73 19,8 


Sonogram 

V Peak V 

101,94,91 37.4 


Zero Crosser 

V Peak at C 
81 x 


Narrow Gate 


Sonogram 


@centerl ine 
V peak 
95 


Computer Calculated 
from profiles 

V peak V 

42 12.2 


The table shows for the wide gate the average velocity at 
peak systole as claculated from the zero crosser and sonogram outputs. 
The average velocity is similarly listed. The narrow gate measure- 
ments for the peak velocity at the flow stream centerline are 
also depicted for both the sonogram and zero crosser and finally, 
the standard method of profile integration produces the average 
peak velocity and the mean velocity. These data show that by 
using a narrow sound beam that obviously a large portion of the 
velocity information which exists towards to vessel walls will not 
be detected using the zero crosser and wide gate. The result is 
a higher than actual recorded blood velocity when using the zero 
crosser. The sonogram whether using a wide gate or narrow gate Q 
produces approximately the same velocity and is close to the peak 
velocity measured with a narrow gate zero crosser method. The 
reason the wide gate zero crosser and sonogram methods produce 



-37- 


a higher mean velocity than actual is obviously due to the narrow 
sound beam. The discrepancy between the zero crosser and sono- 
gram is due to the faulty method of obtaining the mean velocity 
by integrating the sonogram. No weighting of the various amplitudes 
of the signal were attempted. 

We believe that an alternative method for computing the mean 
velocity of blood in a superficial vessel may involve the use 
of a large transducer and a wide gate pulsed Doppler or even 
continuous wave Doppler coupled with sonogram analysis. A 
possible valuable approach to attempt would be to compare this 
approach to the actual blood velocity. Account must be taken of 
the varying signal amplitudes (1st moment analysis) but the sonograms 
offer that possibility. Sonogram analysis also offers an alterna- 
tive method to the zero crosser for detecting the local velocities 
across a flow stream. Figure 13B, for example, shows a sonogram 
for the velocity signal recorded at the centerline. It is inter- 
esting to note that a relatively narrow band signal occurs during 
systole in contrast to the situation using a wide gate where a 
wide range of spectra exist. Similarly, at the vessel walls, this 
narrow amplitude band disappears (Figure 13C). Presumably the 
vessel wall is a major influence in the pattern - both due to 
its influence upon flow and the fact that the vessel wall moves in 
and out of the sample volume. 



VELOCITY (cm/sec) 


NARROW GATE NEAR WALL 



FIGURE 13a. SONOGRAM PRODUCED WITH THE PULSE DOPPLER IN THE WIDE GATE MODE 
FROM A FLOW CUFF ON THE ABDOMINAL AORTA OF A DOG. 



VELOCITY (cm/sec) 


NARROW , GATE AT £ 



FIGURE 13b, SONOGRAM PRODUCED WITH A NARROW GATE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF ThE 
FLOW STREAM IN A DOG IMPLANTED WITH A FLOW CUFF ON THE ABDOMINAL AORTA. 



VELOCITY (cm/sec) 


WIDE GATE 


IOO 


50 


0 



FIGURE 13c. SONOGRAM PRODUCED WITH A NARROW GATE FROM A PORTION OF THE 
FLOW STREAM NEAR THE WALL OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA IN A DOG IMPLANTED WITh 
A FLOW CUFF ON THE ABDOMINAL AORTA. 


i 



-41- 


VIII. Performance of the Pulsed Doppler Velocity Meter 

A. Objectives 

The objective of this phase of the research program was an 
evaluation of the PUDVM for laminar' and turbulent flow measurements. 
Previous studies from this laboratory (1) reported on the effects of 
emission pulse length, transducer and ultrasound receiver bandwidth, 
and sample gate duration on the length of the PUDVM sample function. 

The effects of these individual parameters on the measured velocity 
profiles were not considered here since it was our purpose to determine 
whether a PUDVM system with given operating characteristics could 
adequately describe the nature of the various velocity profiles. 

Velocity information from the PUDVM is contained in a frequency 
modulated audio signal that is obtained by mixing the backscattered 
(or Doppler shifted) ultrasound signal with an ultrasound signal at 
the transmitted frequency. The frequency difference between these 
two signals, the Doppler frequency, is directly proportional to the 
velocity of the moving scatterers in the sample region and is given 
by the Doppler equation 

2f V cos 0 

Af = f D = ^ir — 0) 

where f is the frequency of the emitted ultrasound, V the velocity of 
the scatterers, e the angle between the ultrasound beam and the velocity 
vector and C the speed of sound in the medium. Since the PUDVM sample 
region is of finite size, a spectrum of Doppler frequencies will be 
measured in any flow field where velocity gradients exist such as in 
a contained flow. 

The purpose of the experiments reported here was to compare different 
methods of determining the average frequency shift of the Doppler spectrum 




-42- 


o r, equivalently, the average speed of the moving scatterers within the 
region of flow sampled by the PUDVM. Three techniques were used 
to estimate the average frequency of the Doppler signal: (1) direct 

frequency to voltage conversion using a zero crossing detector; . 

(2) calculation of the first moment of the Doppler spectrum obtained 
with the aid of a spectrum analyzer; and (3) computer-aided estimation 
of the first moment of the Doppler spectrum using Fast Fourier Transform 
(FFT) techniques. Average velocities in the sample volume were calculated 
from the average frequencies using the Doppler equation and the resulting 
profiles were compared to the theoretically predicted velocity distributions. 

B. Methods 

The experiments were conducted in a specially designed test system 
which is shown schematically in Figure 14. The flow system produces 
steady fully developed laminar or turbulent flow in dialysis tubes 
ranging in size from 6 to 20 mm diameter. The test section consists 
of a long length of circular dialysis tubing supported and submerged 


in a water bath. Measurements were made at positions located several 
hundred tube diameters downstream from the entrance to the dialysis 


tubing to ensure that the flow was fully developed'. Flowrates were 
monitored with a rotometer and could be adjusted with an inlet valve. 
The performance of the rotometer was verified by turned collection 


and found to be accurate to within 5% of the manufacturer's calibration 


values. The working fluid in the test system was water seeded with 

cornstarch or cellulose particles to act as scatterers of the ultrasound. 

/ ' 

Concentration of the scatterers was typically 5% by volumev. 

An ultrasound transducer was positioned over the dialysis tube 
in the vertical plane determined by the tube axis and with the ultrasound 



-43- 


beam axis at an angle of 60° to the direction of flow. The transducer 
consisted of a 2.8 mm diameter lead titanate zirconate crystal with 
epoxy backing. 

Velocity and frequency data were obtained with the PUDVM for 
flow Reynolds numbers ranging from 950 to 5000. All measurements 
reported here were monitored in the flow system in a dialysis tube of 
nominal diameter 7 mm. The tube diameter varied with flow rate from 
7.2 to 7.6 iron and this variation was considered in the calculation 
of the Reynolds numbers. For these tests, the PUDVM emission frequency 
ranged from 7.25 MHz to 7.5 MHz. Other operating parameters included 
an emission pulse length of 8 cycles (about 1 psec) gate of 1 ysec 
and pulse repetition frequency of about 20 KHz. 

For each Reynolds number the velocity profile as measured from the 
output of the zero-crossing detector was recorded on graph paper using 
an X-Y plotter. The RMS voltage of the audio signal was monitored with 
a B and K RMS voltmeter. Peak RMS audio amplitude was maintained between 
0.15 and 0.25 volts RMS and the signal to noise ratio of the audio 
signal was at least 40 volts/volt. The velocity signals were scanned 
continuously across the tube for each Reynolds number. A spectrum 
analyzer (Hewlett-Packard model 8552/56) was used to determine the 
frequency spectra of audio signals measured at several range locations in 
the tube. The relative amplitudes of the frequencies present in the 
signal were recorded as a function of frequency on the X-Y plotter. 

The recorded spectra were subsequently used to determine the first 
moment of the Doppler signal. In addition, audio signals from these 
same range locations were recorded on magnetic tape for computer 
analysis using FFT techniques. 



-44- 


C. Results 

Typical recordings of a velocity profile and frequency spectra 
for laminar flow (Re=T430 ) are shown in Figures 15 and 16. A tracing 
of the continuous velocity profile is plotted in Figure 15 as a 
function of the distance from the centerline of the tube. The measured 
profile is shown here compared to the theoretically predicted profile. 
The measured profile is spread at the far wall and the obvious hump 
on the velocity profile between the near wall and the center of the 
tube is apparently due to the PUDVM boundary error (1). In this 
example, the PUDVM underestimates velocities close to the near wall 
and overestimates velocities at the far wall. The measured centerline 
velocity is within 3 % of the predicted value. 

The frequency spectra at six locations in the tube are shown in 
Figure 15. The spectra were measured at range increments of 1 psec 
across the tube however for clarity the data presented in Figure 3 
are for increments of 2 ysec. For each spectrum the baseline was 
set approximately 8-10 db below the peak signal level. The baseline 
levels (in db) are referenced to a sinusoidal input signal of 1.0 V 
RMS. The noise baseline for zero flow was -70 db or less. The first 
moment of the Doppler spectrum was determined from these data and the 
average velocity within the sample region calculated using the Doppler 
equation. 

A comparison of the theoretical velocity profile, the measured 
profile (using analog output of PUDVM) and the profile calculated from 
the first moment of the Doppler spectra are shown in Figure 17. The 
solid line is the predicted profile, dashed line the measured profile 
and the points correspond to the calculated profile. Agreement between 
the predicted profile and either the measured or calculated profile is 



- 45 “ 


excellent within the central core of the flow and the measured and 
calculated distributions are within 10% of each other except near the 
walls of the tube. For distances from the wall less than 1/4 the 
tube radius both the zero-crossing counter and first moment calculation 
lead to substantial errors in the velocity estimate for this example. 

Similar comparisons can be made for the case of fully developed 
turbulent flow. Figures 18 and 19 illustrate the measured velocity 
profile and Doppler frequency spectra respectively for a flow with 
Reynolds number 3860. The measured profile is compared to the 
theoretically predicted mean velocity distribution given by Schlichting 
(2) as 

= k£) 1/n 

u K 

where u * axial velcoity, u" = average axial velocity, and n and k 
depend upon the Reynolds number. For Reynolds numbers from 2000 to 
5000 k and n remain approximately constant and have values of .791 
and 6.0 respectively. 

Over the central 80% of the tube cross section the PUDVM consistantly 
overestimates the mean velocity by 5 to 10%. The shape of the measured 
profile is again somewhat smoothed and especially distorted near the 
tube walls. 

The Doppler frequency spectra for this example of turbulent flow 
are shown in Figure 19. They are considerably more broad than the spectra 
observed in laminar flow because of the random distribution of turbulent 
velocity fluctuations that are superimposed on the mean flow. The 
spectra remain relatively symmetric however. Figure 20 shows the profile 
calculated from the first moment of the Doppler frequency spectra along 



-46- 


wlth the measured and theoretical profiles. The profile based on the 
first moment agrees well with the measured profile except in the 
neighborhood of the walls. 

Comparisons among measured, calculated and theoretical profiles 
for seven different Reynolds numbers are summarized in Figures 21- 
27. Theoretical profiles are shown in solid line, measured in dashed, 
and the dots represent velocities calculated from frequency spectra. 

Computer aided estimates of the velocity profiles were obtained 
using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) techniques to calculate the first 
moment of the Doppler spectra. Operation of the FFT program used for 
this analysis is described in Appendix I. Typical results of the FFT 
analysis are shown in Figures 28-34. The FFT estimated profiles are 
compared to theoretical profiles for Reynolds numbers ranging from 
950 to 4800. The FFT consistantly overestimates velocities for both 
laminar and turbulent profiles. For laminar flow the estimated 
profiles have the characteristic parabolic shape of the velocity 
distribution in a circular pipe, however, the peak (centerline) 
velocities are overestimated by 15 to 20%. The shapes of the calcu- 
lated turbulent profiles are not in obvious agreement with theoretical 
predictions. 

D. Observations 

1. In laminar flow, the velocities in the central core of the 
tube (+0.6 radius from the tube center) as measured by the zero-crosser 
and first moments from the wave analyzer spectra agree within 5% with 
the expected theoretical velocities. 

2. In turbulent flow, estimates of velocities within the central 
core of the tube by the zero-crosser and first moment from the wave 


-47- 


analyzer agree with each other within 2-3%, but both peak velocity 
estimates are 6-17% higher than the expected theoretical velocities, 
the error decreasing with increasing Reynolds number. This over- 
estimation of velocities was consistently found in repeated experiments. 

3. Velocities estimated from the audio spectra using FFT and 
computer techniques are from 10% (in laminar flow) to 22% (in turbulent 
flow) higher than the expected theoretical values. 

4. In flow near the walls, the velocities estimated by spectral 
analysis, both with the wave analyzer and FFT, are many times the 
expected theoretical values. This is most likely due to the low power 
of the signals near the wall. In the case of the wave analyzer, 
spectra obtained near the wall often had a baseline level only 10 db 
above the noise level. Inclusion of white noise into the spectra would 
tend to shift the first moment of the spectra toward higher velocities. 

5. Overall, the zero crossing counter provides a velocity estimate 
that is at least as good as the velocity calculated from the first 
moment of the Doppler spectrum. Near the walls, the zero cross er 
gives a better indication of the true velocity than the frequency 
spectrum. 

E. Conclusions 

1. Central core velocities as estimated by the zero crosser and 
the first moment from the wave analyzer spectra agree well with 

each other, but are only estimates of the true velocity in laminar 
flow. 

2. The velocities estimated by the first moment of the FFT 
analyzed audio signal are not accurate estimates of the true velocity. 

3. Since the zero crosser is more reliable near the walls, it 



- 48 - 


gives a more accurate estimation of the velocity profiles than does 
the first moment of the audio spectra from the wave analyzer. However, 
since the baseline level of the audio signal near the wall was not held 
constant and, in fact, often approached noise levels, an electronic 
first moment processor might prove as accurate as the zero crosser 
near the walls. 



Constant Head Tank 



Figure 14 Schematic Drawing of Test Tank Used to Produce 
Fully Developed Laminar and Turbulent Pipe Flow 






!■■!'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 
S! ! n ■ 1 ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■« 

■li Jii 4 J, IT J: »M!« '■■■■■■■■■■■■; 

gi! 55 SLk«£HUMBnnraKNBH! 

BBSBBBB bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb B 

SSSSSSSSf •^■■■■■■■■n ■■■ 
1BEBB BBB niHi ■*■■■*«■■■■■ 

kssssijik 

iBFEBwW k 1 ' ifeppBSSSSSH 



|ss§»S8S|s|S&Sa 

IniHrnBSwHHBS 

EBBE[ffi!i25'fi B,BBBBBB * 

HSBBBBBE£BB BBBBBB * 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i 

ESSES, 

■■■■■n^nnnnnR: 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■« 



BBEBBSBBBBBBB BBBBHa ""»^^^^Hiiii 


■■■■ IW TBBBWM 



■■■■■■■■■■I 

■■■■■■■■■■I 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a 

BBB^fT 111 VMianin 
■■■» i naunas 

■■■ >■ II 

] ' ■ *■ v ■ ■■ 

*r i 1 1 . c rn '■■■■■■■ 

■ r .I IMHHK 

r . j .i miM m ■■■■■■■ 

illllMllllllll lllIBHHMIlH ! BiBiB 

■■■■■■■■■BSSBS BBBBS! |!/l * BBB I 

!■■■■■ ■■■■ i i< ii v'i ii mm\ 

«■■■ IlhYim 
Ii ■ ii t i ii it i T'n« 

BSSSSfi ULil.fJSi 

■■■■■■■■■ft ■■■■.MM 


IBSSSBSSSBSSSSSSS 

ISBSBSSSSSSSSSSSS 


■'£'■■■■■■■■■■■ 
«»■ ■■■■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■■■ 

■■■■■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 

■BBB BBBBBBBBBBBB i 

!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■■■■ 

■■■■■■■■■■■I 

■■■■■■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 
■■■■^■■■■■■■■■■B 
[■■■■£^■■■■■■■■■■1 

!■■■■!!■■■■■■■! 

■■■■■Bil^HSSSSSSSSSSSSBSSS 


%■■■■■ 
III !■■■■! 


■■■■■■■ n*r 

|BHHiMHH|IIIIIK ii^i 

!■■■■■< .mi iftjB 
■■■■■r-s : lUHHiii i-j ’ 1 r nMH 
^■■■■■■^■■■■iijhyiMHft 


i: hi 
MT 1 

1 1 * II, ll 


■SSBBSBBSB BBSS !BB BnB ■■■■■■■■' 
■BSBBSBBBBB B BB 11 a^inMBaaaaai 
linaiiaaiHRi i| n i iriBiviii 
■■■ ■■■■■■■nr>r i «■■■■■■ 

^■■■■■■■■■n ' / LBI i .Ll I 'Y *■■■■■■! 
liiiiiiiiiir ii ■■! iui iiuf, * !■■■■■■! 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■|B 


!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■«■■■ 

■■■■■■■■■rir 'ii ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M 
■iiiBin r i riiiiiiiHaSSHiiiBn 

^■■ni i m :« 1 it i ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ 555 SSES 

r ■; IIM| '«■■■■■■■■■■ 
iniAlft ■■■■■■■■■■■ 


■■■■■■■■ft 

■■■■■■■■■I 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 

Essbsbsssbsbbsbs: 

[■■■r^iBH ■■■■■■■■■■ 

|BBmBBBBSBBBBBBi 
BBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBB l 

■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 
■»■■■■■■■■■■■■■! 
^■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■If 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II 
«■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■! 

■■L^ninniini 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nil 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■tl 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nil 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il 
■■ii w rra ■■■■■ ■ 

■Mbimnnnni 





\*0O 


^s^nnnsznnwszi 



am 


3000 






PAGE ® 
m POOfl QUALITY 


Ft GO lie \b 



velocity (twjsec'i 


- 52 - 


!?e« l4>“*0 


sfceera*u AhMLWSiS 

T(<VJe PR-OFU-T 


aozo cwS'SeQ* 





veUDcrrY ( cm 



54 


iBBB BBaaaBBBaBBBBBaBBM— 

■— ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■! 


IIIHIIII ■■BBBBBBI 
!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■! 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 


BSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBSHaHHMj 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ml 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 


!■■■■■■■■■! 

!■■■■■■■■■! 

!■■■■■■■■■! 

!■■■■■■■■■! 


!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■! 
!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■! 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 
!■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■! 


muummmmui 

!■■■■■■■■! 


(■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 


!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 

!»»■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiliilifiiiiiiiMBflHHHHBMHHHUBBaaaHH 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■« 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a 
■■■■■■^■■■(^■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■h ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■^■•■■■■^■■ a I 

■■■■■■■■■■ m «■■■■■» ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t'Kr.^fj'uaHH 

BBBBBBB;iillBIJ.nMJ.!IIIBBBIIflflBB'l?llljnBBBril:iBBflaflllflBBBBaflflHBBBBflBBflBBBB:a*rBMBBBB 

laaaaaai^iJiaiMiipliH!iaiaiM ; ii‘waMjfi^niiii!ingnT^iil«niia^imaaa«aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiia^^aiiaaaa| 


m 


!i 

jiii 


mmm 


laaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! 

|1BBaaMMMHMiiiMMii|| 
mi 

Mi 


i a a aaBaa a bit; ■ a ■ . 


l ■■■■ ■■ Sii i ImIm aji t i&iiiiiid 

laaaan m n mi sifei- wfc i iiilS 

■■mi fi\ j i ut rtiiTi* ; iff wmimi 

I ■aaaKf'M tauat hUkB L i ■ k aj- jK. .n rifiii la.-^i rj ! - hbi 

afcBaaaiiaaBBaBBaaajBa'iaaatJiUBauBBtuiiijjaiau'Ja'uiiiryiJ^ia^jAiaaaaB w a w k'^aB 

■BaaBBBBBBBaBBBBaaBBaaaaiiBBaBBBBBaaaaBaBBaBaBaBaBBBaBBBBBBaBBaaaaBB 
■■■BBBBBBBBaBBBBBBBBBBBaHBBaBBBBBBaaBaaaBBBBBMBBBBBaBBBBBaaaBBBBBBa 
■■■BBaaaaBBaBBBBaBBBBBflBBBBaBflBBBBBaaaaiiaiiBBBbaBBaaBBBBaaaaBBBaBflBB 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,'Hi.ia^inBr^tiiiaiiftaBaaaaaaaaaauaaai 
!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■!a»in«iiiira!nh 1 i:iM^iTaaaaaaaaaaaaa«aa 
■MMMHijlMMHMiiirMini 1 m #j«^kii#Kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' 

mriij w ar#^ mk Ml im fipfiiiaaBaaa mummmmm 

if JPPpfri' paaaaa aaaaaaa 

js6aa««jj aaaaaaaaaB ai»«^ffisgii aaaa aww^fv ; !>alilt^l-df«iiity : itei^t^ ; ^;:^!Jl^:«BaaBaagii:iaai 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■aaaiiaaaaaaiaanaaaaaaaaaaaa 

I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■aananaaa aaaai !■■■■■■■■■■■■! 

! ■■■■■■■■■■■■! 

I n I1 1 lflMMMMMM 


iBBBaaaBaBBBBBBtirviiBM 
I ■■■■■■■■■■■(■■■ I'll :.v IP1 f 


R Ba ■■■■■■■■■• 

niHiiciuj 

!■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■KMUiuifiaHaBiiaHiiaiMiaA'jmmfcZBB:: 


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a 

BBBBBBBBBBBBaBBBBBBBBaBBBBBaBBBBBBBBBBBB 


BBBBBBBBBIinai !■■■■■■ 

EBBNiwalpaiiaBBaBBi 

mmmmmai 

I hi *1«, I I V s I -ikf ii# .* 


■BBBaBBBI 

aaaaaBBBBi 


3?.; 


iBB«BBBBBBBBBBBaBaaaBBBBaaaB«aBaaBBBBBa«B r»-' ri^iMaaBiiaaBB.iriiv^r; ■a«n>fBBl 

iBBBBBBBBBBBBaBBBBBaBaBBBBBaaaBBBaaBBaBaaBaaaBn aaaMPBaaaaaaaaBaaBBaBa 

■MMMMMHMMHHHHHlHlllBi«BBBiBfliBBaiiiiBi| 

■■*<■■ ■■**’* *<■■***■ 

I; ■■ «■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 

■LniiaBaaniiRH 
■?■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 
n-" ■■■■■■■■■ 
Fi^^^nMaaaBBBBBBjy 


IBflBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBaBBBBBflBBBflflBVIfl Iflfl 
IBBB H BBflflflBBBBBBBBBaBaBflBBBBBBBflBBI;!B‘liPl 


■BBHBBBBBaBBBBBBBBBaBflBBBBBBBBBBBBHBaill 

■■■■■BaaaBaBaaaaBBBaBaaaBBBaBBBaaBBaaa miliW 

iBiiRiiaMBnaiaiBBamiBHiBiimiaaiMM 
■BaaaBaaBBBaBBBBaBaBBBBBBBBaBBBBBBBBaa^^l 


■saaniliiili 




ifi'! 

Villi OOTt 


mm 

ii min 


^■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mrhrrmrbbwhmhhhivj?’*^' j i lbmi ibbb in inirttfi'# TinaaiB>iaii^ 
MBBBaBaBBiaBBBBaaBa'BBBaBBBBBBBBaaBBaauJBBBaHiiBBBuaaaBUBaaBBaasaBBB.i 
|BBBHBaHMBaaflHBDaBaaBBBaBBBaBBBBBBBaaanBBaBaiiaaBBBBaaBBaBaBBaBBBBaB| 
■■■BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBlMBBBBamaBBBBB«BBBBB«BBBBBBBB| 

ipai ■■ iiaiBaaaaa BBaaBaaaaaaaaal 

liiairiT^ini PiimiB t mi . ■ 

■Kyiir s 1 'Ti'isam 


■BBBBaHBBaBBaaBB*BBaaapiiiTii| 
[BBiHBBBBaaBBaaBBBBBBBBPf.mtMi 

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■paBVBii iwra^ii 


1114 II < 
mJIIBi'I 

n II II 


laaBBaaaBaaBBBaaBBK 


.. . 

;4: l JIUUUBillL. 


Pf I’ ]■■■&■■■ !■■■■■■■ 

ili.hnilBfllBBMIBII; 

i niioiinnnaaa mzznwmm-, 


N •x.ui! I ilgufiaai 

T^r&£4n“=snss^s&!2rm^3gssOK^.s*<ii<#^^ w ■ ? h in — i —insr — ; wr wn ro^rt-i-tis^ssTw® ii JBI I Si tM 

■■■■■■■■BBaaaHBBaHBBaaaaBB jimm iBaai ibbbbi in aaai.aa ii« 

■■■■BBaaBBaaaBBBaBRBiaaaBBaBBBaBBBBBBBBaBBaBaBBaBBBaaaaaBBaBBBBBBaaa| 
■BaaBaaaaaBaBBiiBBBii.'iinBBBBiMBBBBBBBaBBBaaBaaaBBaBaBBBBBBBBBBBBBaaaaH] 
<§■■■■■■■>! n nam miraiBBniim ib na ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■BBBaaBBBmaBBa* 


ib Bin* iii. i 


iniiMiia.fi 


!■■■■■■■; 

ISaiMBiJiHaaffBsafSSiiHfBffiiliiSSI^^ 

linii ■«■■■■■■■■ ■ibai ibj mmu uaau bujiijai u«a imi fcifunaanam * 1 SHSS 51 SB 5 ii £££951 

|Hli|iaaBIUBRaBaiailBiaBBR»IIRRaflRRR|aRBBIBIiaRBBIIBfllBail!aHMi 

BBBPWa — RRRR RRW ■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■■— ■■—■■ ■■■■ ■«■■■■■■■■ —■■■■■—■ I 


!■ ■■■ p?w bhibwrictiiwbbbbb Baanaai 

i Bflaa iflR32tF4Zii2kiisik a; bi !i£^iiaaaa aanaa a ai 


FtGtOfcE' 





VELOCITY 


Tank S»+.udv| 6 /.lo /74 

l~ 8 "/1 5 


-57- 


..*^v!k»c. cIaA slJ3T 




« .• _^p>£&+rst 
— r- _ fheorefic.®! profile 
.“ze.rc trosser output 




o 



veuxiiT-y velocity 


k — blZo.jlH- 

redraw**' 


- 58 - 


3 v.bc .... d i a . > .J 7 ȣ-*n m . 


£0 6» 


50 


2-0 


•* • •. jvpcciritL-- Djntijlyj v- - 
— — , . :hh£..© r £+ i C 29 Ji :p r<xf i ! £ 
,,— ■ _£e,ro: : ' t.raii£X--cu3i^ o t 





60 


50 


2X3 


Re - 3©(bP 


HGOEe 2-S 




weuocitv vetoes 



.00 e»*'* 


tS> - ■ 


40 


20 




/ 

l 




4 


Rfitwnec**™} 

. ♦ 

€> 



n 

iZ 


o 


i 

0 



VELOCITY 


.. ... Te -k> 4 y| i \/ \2>!-l A 



4yfe.< » «7. ‘2,jv»m 






V0J&cn~Y 


Ta.n.U. . .^4v4.^ 



/4 , B' ” 7» Z. »viw^ 




/ , , - 63 - 

„ . "Xsv'iW. ,\\j s''?/*} A 


<dl\®.* 7.^L vyi»»t 



- 64 - 


IX. Performance of the NASA-PUDVM 

A. Objectives and Methods 

The PUDVM designed and built by the NASA Ames Research Center 
was loaned to our laboratory for use in animal experiments and for 
testing and comparison with other pulsed Doppler velocity meters. 

The NASA instrument was used for studies on coronary blood flow in 
horses and the pertinent physiological and biomechanical results 
have been summarized in the report "Hemodynamic Patterns in Coronary 
Arteries" by Wells et. al. This report is included here as Appendix 
II. 

The performance of the PUDVM was determined from tests carried out 
on the flow system described above in Section V. In general the performance 
of the NASA- PUDVM in the tank facility was inferior to the performance 
of the McLeod instrument. This was attributed to the low signal to noise 
ratio and the low sensitivity of the NASA-PUDVM. It was decided that 
any detailed evaluation of the PUDVM capabilities and subsequent 
definition of techniques for the transcutaneous measurement of flow 
should be based on tests with the McLeod PUDVM. These results are 
described above in Section V. 

The effect of emission pulse length, gate length and pulse repetition 
frequency on the performance of the NASA-PUDVM was determined by 
comparing the velocity profiles measured for steady laminar flow in 
the test system. In addition, the accuracy of the flowmeter was 
measured for different input gains. 

B. Results 

An important factor that strongly affects the accuracy of the 
PUDVM is the signal to noise ratio S/N. The number of scatterers 


-65- 


directly influences the strength of the backscattered Doppler signal 
and it was found that in tank studies with the NASA-PUDVM the test 
fluid had to contain a 10 to 15% concentration of scatterers to bring 
the signal to an acceptable level. However, with a high concentration 
of scatterers a proportionally larger number of particles would settle 
to the bottom of the tube and distort the profile from the desired 
parabolic shape. It was not found practical to run the test system 
for more than a minute or two with particle concentrations greater 
than about 10% by volume. Even at this concentration, however, the 
two input amplifiers had to be operating at their maximum effective gain 
in order for the PUDVM to properly estimate velocity. To determine 
the sensitivity of the PUDVM to input gain, the following experiment was 
performed: The PUDVM sample region was centered on the tube axis 

and flow maintained at a constant rate. The output of the PUDVM 
was measured for various settings of the "gain 11 and "range" amplifiers 
and compared to the expected output which was determined from the 
calibration signal. The results are given in Figure 35 which, shows curves 
of output vs. gain for five values of range gain. Notice that only 
for range gains of 95 and 100% of full scale was the PUDVM output within 
5% of the expected value. Furthermore -in order to achieve this adequate 
output the gain was in excess of 70% of its full scale value. For gains 
above about 75% the audio signal became distorted and the output would 
decrease slightly. Hence to measure velocities accurately in the tank 
system the range gain had to be set between 95 and 100% and the gain 
between 70 and 75%. The optimum operating point was easily found 
by maximizing the output of the PUDVM with the two gain controls. 

However, there was not guarantee that the maximum output would agree 

* 

with the expected output. This difficulty was particularly acute 



- 66 - 


when attempting to use the PUDVM to measure velocities at distances 
more than a few millimeters from the transducer. For this reason, 
the NASA-PUDVM is not suited for transcutaneous measurements of 
hemodynamic patterns. On the other hand, when measuring blood flow 
in animals with transducers positioned directly on the vessel, the NASA- 
PUDVM estimates the time varying velocity as well as the McLeod 
PUDVM. This fact was confirmed by direct comparison of the NASA 
flowmeter with the McLeod detector. It appears that when the ultrasound 
pulse is scattered from cells in whole blood (45% concentration 
of scatterers) the power in the received echo is sufficient to produce 
an acceptable signal to noise ratio within the PUDVM. The output of 
the zero Grosser then provides an accurate measure of the velocity. 

The NASA-PUDVM operates with an emission pulse of 4, 8, or 16 
cycles and at a pulse repetition frequency of 13, 26, or 52 KHz, 

To obtain sufficient S/N ratios in the tank studies the PUDVM generally 
had to be operated with the maximum burst length and at 26 or 52 KHz 
PRF. 

Velcoity profiles within the dialysis tubing were obtained by 
slowly scanning the PUDVM sample volume across the tube and plotting 
the velocity estimate as a function of delay time (range). Figure 36 
illustrates two measured profiles and compares them to the predicted 
parabolic profile. The measurements were made with an emitted pulse 
of 16 cycles, a gate of 1 ysec and at PRFs of 26 and 52 KHz. The shapes 
of the measured profiles agree well with the true profile and there is 
no significant effect of PRF on the estimated profile. The measured 
centerline velocity differs by less than 5% from the predicted value and 
this difference is well within the anticipated experimental error. 



-67- 


The distortion of the measured profiles at the near wall appears to 
be less than near wall distortion observed in the flow system using 
other pulsed Dopplers. This might be due to the low sensitivity 
of the NASA-PUDVM, for if the detector is sampling only the peak of 
the Doppler spectrum, the effective sample region would be reduced. 

In addition, the power of the received signal would be diminished 
leading to an underestimation of the true velocity. This effect is 
evident in Figure 36. The fact that increasing the sample gate from 
1 ysec to 5 ysec does not markedly affect the measured profile and lends 
some support to this interpretation. 

Figure 37 shows the effect of sample gate on the measured profile. 
Again distortion or spreading of the measured profile is not apparent 
at the near wall. As the sample gate is increased, the profile is 
spread, however, not to the degree that one would expect if the effective 
sample region increased at the same rate. That is, increasing the gate 
tends to increase the power in the received signal more than it tends 
to distort the profile. The increase in signal power leads to an improved 
estimate in velocity. Between the near wall and centerline of the tube, 
the velocities measured using a 5 usee gate are in excellent agreement 
with the true values. 

Figure 38 shows the effect of burst length on profiles measured 
with the NASA-PUDVM. The power of the backscattered signal varies 
as the length of the emitted pulse. Since this detector is extremely 
sensitive to signal strength, we expect inferior performance when using 
shorter pulse emission times. . This prediction is borne out by the 
curves in Figure 38, especially for emitted bursts of 4 cycles. 

The same response is expected for decreased pulse repetition frequencies. 



- 68 - 


Figure 39 illustrates the effect of halving the PRF when using an emitted 
pulse of 8 cycles. For a PRF of 25 kHz the measured peak velocity is 
more than 20 % in error. 

C. Discussion and Recommendations ' 

It was not possible to fully evaluate or calibrate the NASA-PUDVM 
under the test conditions described above. The major problems were 
the low gain of the detector and the low S/N ratio. Backscattered 
power could be increased by using more or larger scatterers or scatterers * 
having a greater scattering cross-section. However, additional problems 
such as particle settling, profile distortion and non-specular scattering 
are encountered. The NASA-PUDVM appears to operate satisfactorily 
when measuring in blood, however it was not practical to use blood in 
the test system. Improved signal amplification techniques should 
markedly improve the performance of the NASA-PUDVM and allow for a 
more extensive evaluation of the instrument. 

The following suggestions are made to improve the utility of the 
NASA-PUDVM. To optimize the instrument performance for use with different 
transducer material and transducer configurations, provision should be 
made for easily adjusting the emission frequency. At present, in order 
to change the ultrasound frequency it is necessary to tune both the 
master oscillator and the receiver amplifier circuit. These adjustments 
are inconvenient to make and time consuming. When using the flowmeter 
for measurements in animals, it is virtually impossible to readjust 
the PUDVM as different transducers are used. Operating an ultrasound 
transducer at a non resonant frequency markedly reduces its sensitivity. 

Calibration of the NASA-PUDVM could be simplified if the calibration 
signal was a frequency of a fixed percentage of the oscillator frequency. 



- 69 - 


As designed* the device provides a calibration voltage proportional to 
a specific Doppler frequency shift. To calculate the corresponding 
velocity it is necessary to know both the speed of sound in the test 
fluid and the PUDVM center frequency. By using a known percentage of 
the center frequency, only the speed of sound- would have to be known 
to determine the calibration velocity. 



70 


o 

^■4 

tr> 






*g 


u£ 

53 




x s 

£jc 


2 



R<soee: 35 


K *«S 10 X 10 TO THE CENTIMETER « X JS CM 
C KEUTFEL ft ESSKft CO. mn iM.U 


71 


EusSaaSSi^l 

p&BHiinsaSiKKiKKitB 
■as:ia;;:ri!Sd;as:;K ;«3 

■un 

Ksmem ^ s Bi gffismi anEm rjgffi 


HllitMtMvplikMMiialBk. . ... 

paa*M«i«** mmb ■■aapaaapa i«fli«MgiiiiBiiia>n nin*>iaii aaaaaa 


a *bp> ,**»*•■ mmmmm aaaaa aaaaa Baaaa ■■H|l l |«ilMk» v *w mmmmm mmmmm* 
* iMfttin ***** n*«5SSSSiR« 
k*B *a***»a««Ba ** Baa r aaaa aaaap mmwmum»*mm mammmmmmmrnm «(>« MIMiii M l *M 
kBl.Mk a MI**<lr ■■■■■Hill »**»■■* IMKiaUMMII *B«*ai«Maa 

wtwinBii f wwgg mwi wm — ii iMii laiaii 

I ■•aaaaaaap aaBBBaaaaa iftaBBaBHllnBi a aa * a* initi aaaaa « »»*•■ hui ipmi M an i w— ■ mmi anapa 

I ttl^laakli mmmmm •■»•« Hill PPBB* PP PBP PR BSaPPPRaa aaaaa* aaaaa PB*PP* a *«P IHlllliaMaill llkll ■■*!■ UMlNkM »«»!» 

I Mill »AIM •»••!•>•• I lllliatBlltiEf* BBBBBBBaBBBBBBBBBBBBaBBPaBRBBa ■■■■■•••>•«■*«■ BB*aa ■■■■■ ia««i VMI I IIBia I ■••■ B« MM Misa ■ 

I ■•■■■ aaiai iaaaa«»ii iBBiaaBiiaaBaaMiMf BiBlaBafaBaBaaBaiaBaiBBaaaiBBa aaaa a BBava a a aaBaBBas aaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaa a aa««*a a nnami^^^E 


■■■■•■paaa ••*■■■■ 


MllHMM 


aaaa 


fBBiiannaa aaaaiBaMa b£5^£55R 

I BVBBf mm mui *■■■• aaat* ■» ■ ■ ■ pim ■ v bbbb#*bbb *«*a* an ■ a a ■ ••• »*"■• mMb ***«• ima a •■■■■ nan mmmmm mmmmm a 

aaaa mm atPPi a laraa aa aaa aaaaa vpbib bibbb naa a a a a aa iibbi aaaaa aaaamnaaa •■•*■ ■ »•»*« ivbh ■»* ** » »;■* vbbbb bip» a*«aa pan Map** a 

MIBIBBBII BBBBBBBIBI «B*BB1BBBBIB«BB*MBI BlaBBBaaBBBaBBBIBaBBBBBBBBaBBB BUIB ■■■BIBBaaB • *••# (■■■latfll BBBB 1 1 aaa a a ■■■> ■■ BBB ■■BBfiiMB a 
aaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaa sukaiiiaiB imbiBMIi BBBBBBBBBBBBBiBiiBBBBBBBaBBBflaBiaiBBBBaBaaBBi aaaaa *•••*•**#■ aaaaa aaaaa a MPIBBX 1 ■■raMppBMB 

IBBB»aBBBN»taHkH*iaB»tlli»BBaaBBBM MtlIBB Biaa>BBBBBaBBiBBBaB»Bm*BMMiBBIIBBBMB»BMBMia»|gB>BMBlBaiaMBiia Bai—ia^> | 

pp aaa aaaat aaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa ■pbBbbubbbbbbbpBbBBBMbrBbpPb aaaaa aaaaa aaa a a aaaaa aaaaa ppbIbbuhbmbi BBbbp aaaaa aaa aa Baa n a 


a »bm imm aa aa a ■ a aaa a a aaa aa aaa aaaaa 


a«aa aaaaa a aaa a 


£s! 


I ««B«*m«i ■••tSBBIBMBVBIMBBI BPIBBPBPBIBUtBaaflBB IBBBBM«V1 ■■WB^pgpgfiP|Pfif ■PjjPPBBPBjPpp 
aaaaa aaaaa iMB»i«n»i*ixnwiit BMiaDlMitiBiawfi tpaiapaasB aaaaa fgaia ;»***§■«•* SMS2S212SS2* 
niiHiii hbiibbmi if Bkaiaiit iuii a ibmipbnvbbbi aaaaa •■*•■ aRap* ••**** 5* 55 822 « SSSSSS95S1 SSS 
■bpisbbi aaaaPPaflB* aaaMaaaaaa HHaimMifNiMia bp wvp«mb *fPi«iaPBB 


pSaaaanaaa** “£•*•»£*** 

MMMWM MM * fcgfr M 1 

jlSjwi aaBiItaB ihBb 5 ?« SSala aa»n aSSn # I S" I 

i^^^^ssiasaa a Sai asI 

|Knuiu anaaSflBL 

MDOaCAK 19 PUM* ««***£ 9 

-»» mmmmm *Mt*l ***•£ 1 

■■MMMMHBIHVBaaBaiBikaaaflpnil 
tt MMii mmmmm wwmmm m mmmm bkpBB Pb* * ■*#*! wd 

: aseasaSiSS!!K 5 niiiiiian !iisi 


IffiffiESgaiSS 


s grass:: 

BBaaMBlMf ■ 


kaa a p aaaaa a- aa p aaaaa f“fS 5 f 

HV&ap aaaa a aaaa a «§>»»■>> anaaaana aaaaa aaaaa mm mmm j 

■ aaaaa ataai *■*»*«*■»« aaaaa ••bb«B«*« ■>»■■ mmmmm a ■■■■ »■■■■ — MM 
iBBaBBaPH B*>bbbmmm«bmM^ 




aaaa— — — 

k*4aaBP«BBIBt<PPBI>«PliW a»B» OB 
mmmmm ■ mmmm rav ,aap» mm 

I WHRWVWVIIPVVVHINHIKpb* **a«p aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa adiBPlir 

••PkB aaaaa aaaaa •***« «MB«>pa*t •a.a.aaaaa aa.aaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa ■■■■■■■■UMMlMMMi 
***»«« aaaaa aaa* aaaaa Mataiiiti aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa ■■■■■■■«BiBPiiiipa«ir| 

— T — MUiiam aaaaaaaaaa »«n»M»pa ■>»»■> ■<■ r J 

><•«>»«»« rMi< >p*«< nr*. aaaaaaaaaa mmmmm mmmwmmm mm mmwmw* jd 

•B**a«a*a^BBanaBB^a»aMPaPB*BaBiaBBBnBBBPaBPanwBBBa**nBgaBl»lia»B ,M 

WFA 


«S± 

«aar< »a« 
Htr-PBI 





I IWVinOTMmHwaa aaaaa mmmm a a a a aa ••■•«••■■■■■■»■■ aa as aaaaa ■ 



bngHn»Bi«imiiaiiBiiiiiiiiiiita«ii ••••BaaaaaBaBBBaaaapBf 

^^^^^■teaUBBBii ta»»iaaappaaaa««»***J||«|||||Ajn||||||j|fl 

| ■ajalTTaaS rrrZaaaaaaSwpaaaiBB 


|ES7aSHnunn7n mibbS 
aaaaa anaaaa aaaanaa taaaaa 


xssssss: 
EaSi 

ffiSSUSS 


J^HSSEESSHHfy 

nPilit 

j^saaggggjggjs^ 

MMBbi m I 

^mmmmmrnmgmm mmmm*w 


aaaaaaaaaa iwbiiiiibuombbbi 


■ aaaaa inHlBMitia«BBMBii«aBiMBUiitBHmi 


||MimilfMI«RMMIIPlllllMB |BIMT * BJP# B P *B ■■ ■ ■■■■■ ■■ 4 IBB ** BUI ■■ i V Pi 

ipaMM mrnm mmmmm a *« mm a « aaa a na a r Mpaiar-M aaa ■ a a aaaa aaa aa a naa aa a aa aaaa a y S> ■ 
•aaaaa* P«« aaaaa a* a* * a a a a* a a a ■■:«!« -^apa a aa a a a a aa a aaaa a aa a aa aaa ■■ a aaa a a ft ■ 
pappailil 1 aPkBBiBBatBBPBBiaaafiMiaaf ,#ap aaa a a aaaa a aaa aaa aaaa a aaa a aaaaa a- la. 1 
a aaaaa aaaaa laapfeBipa aanai i ■BiBaaBaaiaPMaaiBMmBHHBMfia m i 


■■BBiaaBBl PBPBBiiaiBBaaaBiafell Bail 
iBBaflipappippppaapaBBaaiBBaPNi aaa t 


. iiupiiBBiaaPfiip aa aaaaa aiiaBBPflBPPB Map > ml 

upf *ii««iiaiiapiii ■■■■■ iaaaaa< mmmm. JlprBfiiippiB**ait**tl*atpliBBat«fPPllPBB '..b* 

E mat miai iUfM i mapavanpiaiPPaiMMiaBBat ibppbipmmbbk V « 

kaiiiaaaaaP MaaplHaMataiBBaiiiaiai iBaiiaiiBBr Miiif i iiiBPaBBaapflaPP*ai«**«BP««a aiaaaaaBai aaaaa.. M 
Chm mtt.at laiaimai a«ia<M»>M>»»Mi »»*pi hiimm m t aa mmmm mmmmm aaaaa aaaaa »aaa«aPa« “*•*■ a 1 

. mbMPPam kaaaa ■ *■ HaaamRiHPiRfPaiP aaaaa a*«|t - <mm a ■ranaaaaaaapi ippaappapi ( ppm pp»br wnamj 

i«p«aaaa*p «»«#•••«■ aaaa a aaaaa aaaaa aaa aa aaa aa *■«*■ ■•««». wffl f mi bbrbbi ••■«*■«■■< p ■ ■■■■«••• aaaaa ■«••• wbbrH 
BnanMMMMIHMIlllAIIIMillflIIIIHillllillillllltfill! Mpp ppppiiippiipaai ■lapiiaaat «««■« aa nannaj 


RMPPfB 
a aaaa* a 


RBBPaiR 

RR PR t i ll 




■ BMBBBBBBRB 


•aaaaaaaaaa 


IPMBaiktlRI 


B*!ai*»iiaiBBiB»BBkB aaaaaaaaaa aaaaa ■••■• aaa aa : ia a» miai aaaaa bpbbrbbbbi ■■■■aflipai alnkP BiaiBBBPaBBPPl iMMlPfRlBlfaBRi. 1 
•«•«••■•■• aaaaa. iMJ/afii £•■ rppp* aaaaa aaaaa Raaa«aaaap ■■■PpiRapaBMaBBaMBBaiBRpB*p|B««aB»«i 1 




aaaaa «■*<» *«•*♦•*■*■ 


. . . ^^^CaaMMB«SMMMM^a?a< r A 

.... JVEC ■■■»« mmmm m mrnm mmmmm mmmm* •**•/! im 

iiikim*iiijm*a>ii>| pxl.' m 

niBHlBRi aaaaa a a a a a a J;*aa +f[t ^ftaaaZaaRnaaaaaaaaaaaannaaaaaannnaaaanBaanSj^aRRaiRBaan aBS fna 
lai a" •»••» *«p»b aaaa a aaaaaaaaaa aaaa brBbBBrp aaa i l rAB rb«p«bpbpr aaaaa a a aaa a a aaaaaa aa aaaaa aana aaaaa aaaga Eppit i ■■■>■ mum mi umm 
lZi^lllI2lIlI MMMIHa > MBHMMk xx a uuu^ipkakmap 1 ifPBi aaaaa a a aaa ua aaaaaai aaaaa aaaaa aaa bubpBBMMI «i aaa ■•■■■»■ 




■ ■HMitupiiaiai •BPa.r«aBP«M,iPBPBBHflBBBp 


BBBBBBBBPRRkRpRRkPBBRiaRBBBBBBaBaBaaaai 


paRRMBaRRlRRMRMIRBRlii 

aaBaiaaaaaiflaiaaaaaaaaaaa 


aa anaa aaaa* a 

! |bpxbrpppbi mmmmm map laikpHta an hup«i im* 

I — Pf MPf RbpB P aaaaa aaaaa rpppr — pi ppuppppi 

r~~~Ttrr~T* " 1 ' " 1 r — p br— d 

■naai aaaliPBM PPbbr aaaaa aa aaa »»»•• 

JB S j gaB P PM pb MPf* p r r pi »P M PM aaa aa aaa a I 

KiBffiEmm^Ka;g 5 »Egs:r^ 

awiiiBgKSiaHgiiiaaaaSaiSEgaiKa 

Bni WllWMUUR M«M iiiu 

MP*«H" mm ■■■pppaiippulbaPMiBBMa ipp>pii»ap a l 

Iuii 


iiaiBBiSKigi iaal 

aaaapBRfpptiapiRPPPafi^m 

* i aia a a aai a Baaaa ii 

b alaaa £a a 5fi itaa i BaSaiSfl 


■PRPlBPtBBBPR 



^=S5S.^i:U:H:niili 


iaaaa aaa aa aaa a a aaaaa a 


S imOpRpi p pm«* aS aaa aaaaa bbmb aaua aaSa* ai 
■ aa a a a aaaaa ppppbrhm ■■■■aaBaiMR npprbprppw 


aaa aaa aaa 


a ^BaaSSaaa Eaa mbOT : 
BaHp5rffBpra tt55a Saaap&aaaaa 







a 6 aaaa Saala bbSb aSB »ji 88 n 


I UlMtf 


■PIHIIIHMHMMihi « »•* , . , 

*ppp**MM i«i»Mi«irwiini ■ ■ ■ ■ p "fcgssa maw *“?£* JPPg )r.Uu;i«« mama ■ ■ ■ Pfti **P*P a p | ki a 4 »p*p •#*•« « P ■ a pppppp I 
** ppp pr rW fi i f t i * a t«* ft/ijjp ■ M •* fli 48 *l**i J fc>H' ft f Al AS WfS*2* St* *■■!* ■■ ■*» amamw a a 2p a h«h |«a *««■■■■ ■**•*■ 

a * i ■ * | 1 - 5 9ftj« i * ? ' Sj fiiS'J I P 0.*.* f Al'iiil 1“ ** f • • *■■** am ■»§ pup* p* ill **•*■ fipp« « ■ ■ puppppp 

**■■■■•«#■ tamaaamaa Ip* J r ;< pppp ijl*pppv>ppfr.r utP>**»: j .*p4i:,Wp«*ppp ■■■upai«*i >•■■■ n9u iimtlui Eiinnnni 

PPPWPPPPP IMI ■■■«! «■■■■ PPPP» pP pa» p m mm I »•*■* 


(■■«■ ■* *■*■ ■ ■ ■ pppp* • 

aama a a a pbI ■ 


Uppp PPPPpupp ■ 

p§Bp3pp«pppZpS« 
a Sf a mamma aa a a * a 


- WmaaaamSSaaaSSmiZ ■■PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP BJmm ■■•a»wiiaifl«»a pppp ERKKKfE 

•• iaaa ■ itaaa »'aaa ar if/, < ppp jpr**v*P ■■■pppppuppppppppppppppppPp pppppppmpp «iai« ma pppppp pppmi ppppppppp* pppppp pappnHnnMNMA 
■* **■ aw ««■« 1 -wi ’«• 4 .wr ala r i» a » ■ a a warn ppp * t ■■ ppp ■■■■ ■ ■ ■ p ■«■>« ppppp taia ■■■■■•■•aai »■■*** pppp 

• m «PP» MMII lllilM it. M * i* r >9 a m f . ■ PP'-JV • **■ ■■•»■****»** III Pi PPPPP PP P ■ ■ |BlAAMMU|MkMA|AM||AA|A|>AU|UA|>Mt|UP 




laaiaaaiaM 


pp ppp ■ ■ ppppp ppppp pm p p p pp p pp p pp pp ppppp aaapa miaa ■ 


pa Paanaa aaaag ma»* • 


WMW: 


sks: 


■5!pppTp5p55p35i 

SsU 2 ::sȣs*H 



BBT»rrr5555r55iS55r55r55M5»5T5rr«Si»!5r»S5w5SSB»»ii ***** mamuM am 

la ■**•;•*■■■ **••* ■■■■■ ■■■■»■■■■■«■■»» ■■■■■•pppp •**■■ ppp ppppuppppp •mmmaamam pppppp pppppp *«*■**•*■*■■ 

— — — — — — — — — Mia—— PUP— aa— a— — — ■ — —a ■— — — — jtfPi i»§ p j * p«pp 1 1 i»s j — mam mmm amma a Ml 


bammimmuimm 

* 

■^■pp*****papp*p*ppppp»ppw^i«pppppppa^»ppMy iyifiiipP'asi»B<gia ‘8 ■< 


a »■■■>■■■■« m« ■ 


aaita«paipp«a»a 


SESSffl 

SSiSSj 


.... _____ _ . - III 

■m«Maai>maama*ii natM*«*HiUtaiamiaUHaiaaaaaaii^WMPMHMHHMBMHHMHHHHM||| 
••aaaitttt maan ppp**pvpp* BaMMaMMItaatviai •%»**••••• ■•■■ivaafi ppppp ppppp ■■■aiiiiiBaaaaaaaapiiBHiaaaatuKimtRHi 

;«*pp ppppp imM*aaM p*p«*pp**« ■aaNt*iBa<iaai«aaa* iMaiaaaai lamMiaaMaNiaMai aialalliiiiBialMHaianiiiiiiiKiHHll 
warn pp a * p •• itaat am MjUaaaiaaaiaaaaaim^aoaMiMa^BataiBMaaMOiiaNMaaaiaMaaaaaB^ 


ir.sasxr.i 

:=Hn~=: 


SiUSI 


■ ■ pp*ppp«*p* pp*p*;ppp* 
iiiiaaanaiiaaaaiaaasi 

■a— aaaBMattawiaaaM 





■■■aBiiaaaB<«a»a<aaa*a •aMaB*i«iBaBaaaaMaitNMaaaH aaiaaiaiu 

•» ■ ffaaaappaajM*** *»ib 5J iiaiBiaMataaiHiniaBaaviHBiiBMiiiiiinaiii 

ttiaaaa Hdiaaaaaa taaaa mmmmammmmm a aaat BMmiaaaaaaaa* • ■mmmmmmwmm mamma mm a mm m a aam a a am w mamma a 


>taaMHaat|WMiawMta» 


imiimmiH ... ... _ . . _ . 

p««pp p»«sp p*p»i *«v«p «■#■•»!»»«■ »p»ppipppp panVi MaBiimiMBBai ivaaaaaaaiiiiMMaiiiiiitaviMiiiiiiiliiiiaaiaaiiiiiVVVT 
MwiutaaitMiimia •■Ba«aMM*a*HMiaii ■MktmMNiuiBHi maamm »•*•*■•«•***«■■ ••*«»«■■■■ bp ■**<!■ ama ■■■«■*• mamma 

ttattpiamMataittaM iauiaaaa« aaM»«f«aiaaaaaaaaaaa«HRaBMa aatHflaiBiaiMMa rail aaaaBMaaua ■■mtkppiapfeai 
*"•*« mat m maa a-mrn a#a»aaaa«a «4 ***** * “»•» am mam Ml* v m ***** * »**■ ■■ ««« mCbb aaai ••«■■■ >■««#■■•« aaaaiaaNa >«*■■ 

■ ■ ■bpmpbi **—»»% ■* # bp— awn— ma *«pail taam imMaMaaaa—a i a aM aaB<a— ap»aaapa aajii aaaaia»M«a — i B P—aa awa a» 

■ waaaaaai mma mm mn aatatnaat wm a* <*■ pn** **•■* ***** pntav ****■ 

• ** am »»pp - mm <rm *»««tP»iPpM«aa »»*••*««>• **«•«« Sp;;**m*p ■ 

uan.kiti »*«»■ p «*ppp*«i»appp ■**»*#• »■■ ppptpppppppt iMHiiimiiMiiimmia 

iMMMnMiPPmaimttMmmitmiMiaai Naaaat«>*taatamBM«iilT 

■ * **i ppppa na«M.mn ia» wM ■ mi •• »tm pp hmmiuiumi aaai phi* maaaa 

imii«M*)n Mtf Mim tmmiupwiiMiiiw imimH*mmmmiiippM 

miiiimm ttiaa iiiM maiaimi imm* mmi ittmimpi tkaanaaiM pupipipHH , 

Miammatimai I«aa» »a*aafafai>H«mB<maBMa m«m lommaai »aaaMaaa« mat 

pS!i £i si !55SS!{| IS2S5ISSJ2 Un«UHSS!!£!^U S23! 

■HHHftHatnpaaa pMMNam 52 »*pppSS 3 ibImmm! ihmmSSi pp« ppppSp^TpI 


IHMimiM 

pppppipPPppp 


■iSS SS g 


ipiihmh taai 


Mmit iin taati «***■ 

Mpaa fxppPPBnpppp tan 


* aaaai aaaaa aai BaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaB anaa ■■taa ■■■ aa #ati 
liMM aaaBBaBiB>BiBaiaiBiiaaBaaaaiBi maiauai pppp 


mmmm 

■HI 


liil 


!*£*•* SSS*53 

M*«i»ai Mi ia 


aamamma 

PPMPP ■ 


ssss: 


u u«ai pupp tail ■ 


!“»*:! 


RkRIBlMII 


I MW laatM 


■aa»iM»«aa 


^r/f r ««a 

I TTppTppbp* *«p]|pppppp pippia»ppp7iMipi««ppiiipppi iiiii iiiiiiiiptiiiiiir;'!*#^ 1m PPPMPp7^pppppZ?H^7«p«Mrpp«ppaT 
p tm mmm ma mam IHM Epmi aaiaa ■ ■ iup mpp«« aaauia iNim •■■■ ■■»■ r;.< tmr*. m inimiN ■■■ ■ ■ ppmpp auaapiawa ppp>a 

rjliaavinai 



b:::n 

b»uu:!Sk; 

nil **•*■ aaaaa ••■aa a 

feSs aSaat 

sfsxnra 


m 



::kss 




ifnta>t»naaa*«animian«ilp>tMMHin>nan« ;*■**>_•*** ff'.f gg^*»***g»?»**»****P»*»P* »■■■■ uail»ii*f >*****a*M^ M l P*M*** KS^i atag* M»up p»»i Bpii> »H» 

: 5 :^::rs::::zrr::::s 22 ::zzi::ri:ir^;::r::s::rsss:: 2 srr-:s=V 5 r /j 5 :=:: 2 ::r:::=:::zr 5 s: 2 :si::::s::r= 3 :h::::rrr:^rli^a.^SKHrtHEi^HiKss:fiS:£=£Sr:rriu 5 ;irrriir= 5 T 


■WPWipiMiM aHMiaaaa HmmiattaMuaaaiiayMi ■- ■ mmaaaaaaaammaammaamaaaaa> 
Bum pp»B a ammmm iBaai »aaa« aaaaa w ..m mm> a t ^ ■■■ inh anaa ■ ■ ■■■ iaui ■< 
JWmmmmm mmmm**wwww »*aa««ma« ■■m>M»i«aMai«aai r*M a mm m‘- / pafaaaait«fiaata>»aawf< 
imiim *ppp*«*»p«P****p*i*|i ■■*!«•*■■■■■*■■■»»■■*■ 4 1 mmw.v.'.m tnauiiaataaiaaflaiaHHai 
>■■*■■1 aaapi titta laiaaMin iuu •*■ *■■■■■■■■ ■■■ n- \ma it i .•■■■ ■■■■■•■■! ■ ■ ■■■■ n 


luWru^S^^MUMUuSMMSSSuUBUUtMUrSSSuUPPUuS* » 55 pJ?H 

a * 1 - IT J i .*■■■ Baaia BBBHaaaa ■ ■ ■■■■ RUBUMaafiaaia ■ auiiianu ianMElf 

S na -«ppp J * ■# •saBaappaanBaaaaaBaBaaRpaaiaaaBaaaaaiiananaaniuiaaiKi 
| * maaw *• » paaaaiaaaa laaaifiMiaaaaaaaaaai aaBnaapwiaaiiaaMfenMiiBP 

MBMMMMMMnnnMMnnnnnBBBnnB|iHBUiaaaiiaaiitB 

{ ■p*fi*itp«ar*iM**s* 
#a*i i !■?*•* 


■aiaaBMiatiBai 


liatmaait 


a »p**p**ibu aaaa 


■■■■■■■■mitipipimaaiiima 

■ aaaina*BMaaMapaafaaaaanaaaa«aaHVHPHIPHHIHVVp|IHpnHHVIIIVHHIIIR 
mluuiiaM mn ■•••■ a a mma •** ■■ «■•*•[! viart «•.. t -* pppppMp«« aNaaMaaiaaaaBaani pMMIIlipiV 

■npwpMMiiiiatiipiiiian oaiac j* f aaaaaaatMi >paai kaamipaaa •■■■• ■■aaaaanai pp ■ iiiipi 

E»m»>aum.i-aaJ .P*« a< t « E«aaaupa»tapataaa»«paaappw.* aaaaapntaiapataiMllMPH 


I 55553 5 




■ ifaannuinniauanMMp 
launaaailinpgMpaiaaaaiBf 

: snn k m s::S ::::: k::: :: 

liiiiiiliiiiiiH 

BUllimPfPtMlIMlIWIM 


— ■■ ■ MM P aw 

mBmmmmmm 


■ a«miBaaatiaiaiiaaa*aaaat**nippap« a | V*a*naapta»aal ipppapppppapanavappa lfaaaaaaaifaaa«a 

IMaat ■aaa»*i»aBi»aawiBB*t aaaaaiaiaa li'la^iaaitnapaMaaiiniaaaaiitipaMinamipaiiiiMiiMi 
T5*u* Kait >Ba»t ia ta a«ai»t ManaaiaM*' | amaaana p«*p •••«»« aaaaaaaaaa •■mbiiimmiih 

IpppPB ManHatimnaaiaM pppppbpppPP* laMam—M MUlUmi— HIM— — MMM—aiK— — 


a a a an* laaaaai *« ■ 


ftMBPP**PP< 


■imaiaiatM ■(•nmiM4t|^ia»i»ttipaMaiiiiMi appppipppp •aaaaMaaMMaiiMaaaaaaMiaaitiiai 

ii mp»puppp ■■■•■■■■■■ ai m , i»ii aakapiaiaaaaaaaaaaiiiaflaap aam pppiatt Riiamf piiiiaaiin pipppii iipbp 


■MWMIi *P *»■ a 
p p »p p*a pppsppp p ■ pSI P 

PPRPPPPPPPPPPPPPP&PP 

MMHmunm * ■ p i p 



jlSSiSgSHSI 

I PM*pppp 4 rp ferMpp p 




*«p*ppip*n 

SfHugH 

mm 


w aupppppppppp*** pp*pp»*ppppbPPI! 
punMnUM ppp ppp*p m maw 


□>, pp m ppp a * 5 p p p p pp**a tana ppppp a 
?*.: * p ■ p p a Epp p ■ mamma Han aamam a 


I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 ! 1 ill 'l I 1 M 

p a a aaa ip«<u <}+ ma ppp a* tana lnii«*aai ppUPPPPPapPPUppppppaaPPP pbp»P pmpp* 
apnfi at*a5.r rjaaaaaapan«afHMaani laaaaunt laaaapaua naainpaa pnaaa 
■ ppp pa »- # pppspppsppppppppapppui nmammaamam mama a—npp— aap— a —— a 

appiait' af ^i fZmw 55555 * **** n*M a aaaa aaaaaaaaaawiaaanaa nnaaiaaaa guawai 

VS p 5 aaa S 555 p 5 p 5 mS 555 pp 5 p 55 ■SSuSSSSSSmSpSSSuSSSSmSSSS^I 

> iaa'fl bm« pp ppp pimaiaam mM« nnaiBPia nan aaaii iiataaana i 
hpr* .rM I rl ‘ p mmmm ifiiiiiainiaatifaai upppPPBMf iBPtpaauiannMni fl 

[T T iii T mp j'i'pPM ppappaaw* p* pmpppppu P 

Lpp p Il ippi f (inaii MMPPPiat — ppp iaaat pppta ppma imnaMaa ppppppipp* p 
iap>atp *•■ j bati mmiMiMfnaaaapai mai bipaaMBBaaa'*af ataaBBakta i 

»*•(■ ppp pa ^PPP P ■ 

)■« iam**w#T,»«« 


msma m 

gMiH 

ill 


X 5555pp« pppp pu bbph P«ppp*«patpppppp a 
S PMaauwjH nwa nan £^Sa53aSSE5S 





■BBS 




P6UR£ 3~l 


K # C 10 X 10 TO THE CENTIMETER ip K » CM , £ . cin 

C Kturra « c«ser co. ««n m »u 4 o 151U 


73 


I V ‘ 


CffHHmfimi M»1Par«*9** RMI HIM H WMM I HIM MWfc »■■■«■ ■■ ■ fM— «B11I ■fgfll 

*>*9 flllTMI'BBHO* ••■iOfkKOaaOOMBBBBBBBBBBaBBBl »«■■■■*»*« ■ •»«§ 

^ilii«*w<a*M»iB«M«BBBi «••***•*•« BOooOMMMaoaMMtaaBBBBaMBBiioiMHtinM 
n» MUBtlllBbllBna •■•BBMrBb lUBlBBPPII « •*««•■■*« iMPIlNUIIIIIIkltl PMlBP«Pf|BffHp 


Wmm 

*»■»*» ■"•«•«••••* i«a iiin w MflBSRiPBiLiiBRHa •■««;mh«p iupibpppb « •*««•■■*« >p«niHiiiBBi>Bpp«i bmbiiiiru b ir ubii m I P f if* 1 

MU M*»«v»ip*n *4 {rM***a|i arpp ■ i ra *!2*SS5 M 5 £*«■■ a mil kBiPP k«P*B MliiiHa* SSfiSS 

» ktMr 9*> 4 a pS.'f • A *£* if, 3 A*** Wf * M * MPPBpfpBifk »i»fP*lPP*PM»PiMBi Raff a «*»■»»# 9*9 §**■■»•■•» 

■Pl«l ■>!,! iM4 m'lu k \* ,* r 4 r «. : 1B«P p • B" u tPM.^.4’ 1 lUBBPPPBi>mP>PPHifBBPBpPBkBBkPPBpkplPPI|pkPiM| Bi ll»i>i Bi BMPHl 

flmiHMMHiPUIIkMMBapPflBPPkkMfeBkBkpBPnimBBPPHBBPBkBBkltBBBBiniBPIflBItBIflHRBaimSBPiBflllPPBfMMipnsaBtfB 1 

tffRflBiBUBiHkata>*!«BBBM*iu ?« #•■< 3 «*■■■«*••■••- w iMkikUMuniikiitiMiil ii l i»— 

■* P — b * Aw i» • **< ■•*£* *i **>*»* »^p« n;AT«^kkM>uM»« —p*ii w !l 

p*BPBBPPMM<R»apiBMMM||j 


m 


nsissu 

MUlllfl 

iHIBiBMi 


KSSRSa 

KiSSSSK 




:sss: 


*•1 ■*■■■■ 


im\ 

ids:: 


^EbrbMmubpmS 


B BHBB RB«1* BflBIMB BBBB BBflfl B PPM* 
rkapikiRkka ■***« B»-«* B ■*« ■ * Pair* 


* ***** »p«*rbi ■ ■ • ; * 


rjssisa:s ss::s:iSsgg:{ig{ssg;ss:^{SissKaj{as:Bssa ss: ss:saiKBas asissi g:affls ^ss: ssiSBSiK s si s s:iiissg:s 

HHnSSS Z* SS«7»Sa«5S S5S5S •?•?* II 5 

laiikiit«p*«#kkiPkkaPk»»»Pktkka*<kkBP*aPRRaHBapikBakkaaaalklupiiap| •«»■■•»*»»( S 

[mm* mmm *«■■■* ■••*4 k»*kt inkMaakf *P«« iHfluiikiMiBiiiBn umm*mm»mmm* iHUkHki w\ 

TMHpiiMMii i MR* ■■iiiiiiSai] 

OjjApBllBHtB'PISiPHBHBa*' 8«Hak9 3flaif iPAIEPk 

■•■■'. ■-■ ■■ ■-■ ■•.'■■•■ * * am m ■! 

IMflBBi 


I HlNMpril •iUIBlIPl BBiPiiliBi 9***9 ***** 9***9 ■«■■•■■■■• BBBBBBBBI 

tPBPP M«PP BBPOBMBM PPkM*P»Bi BBBBiBBBBIBBBflBlBBBBBBBBBBiBI 

kPtik impi itkkBkPff* kvppuHpti 


Mt*R ft 53 STS ■ kM I 

K | MiPBMWkJIPPMkkiM 
mmmmm ******** »• ■ m**9 

a»*MrtMk<»kkikktk P 

m •**«** — mi bbbb ikwii 

BP>HM»MM»«BB||BPPimUR 


I kPPBkPTaPk ItPlHkRBaiBBBBPBtVVi taaktkPPH ifekkllkkaf BPMktkWPVI BPPBPPPPPk BBB1BBBBBBBBWBBBBB BBBBkBBBBB 
PMfV MIBB ■■ ««■ BUI* kPPtl WP (•MMUtl MBBBBBBIB PiBlI iBBM iPPU BilU BMBI BfllVB BBBBB * ** ** Wf— ***** 
ppppp T Ipll BBlig I VlptlBVM BtfPB PfBMlBfBBI ■■■SB V— IB PPBlBPWMBiB BBBB— B R il ilBlWB ■■■■■••>■■ B— BiMB 

5a»aaf 5555 ■ 5533 5335» iff — —tkP mmp —mb iSiiipSSSSf SSw ■>*»> — HBt n5S?i £j^}****2***”””****y****^i^* 


r£S»g»»»Sf s 

u* sssssssKa gjs: ■ 

f — BBB fBBBBt— t 


iiiisiHsiEis: 


UPHktijlf I 


VtlkVPPPPPPfPB 




tPMPatiP MB PBPtf !9"M 


I run 


fpPk MkP» Mppk IBPMBBBPt MRV« ***** ■•MkBt—l|BfM|«tUBBfMkM«lkBIBlBUBkMBMa 
fMlMMBBUUntUIMP* IBVPt MpPtPP»«tPBM* kPBMMkPl |B^M»WtB tBi— ■ —■— B 
ZZZ* mMUPPI UWinapk ppiMMMI M4fMB«Pp ********** ********** WMWW* ***** ****** 


mm\ 




iiiiU 

RrrrTTTiiTTitsin^ *s«si 

HHHtkkPMkMIlluilIkklliPMIkkM 

H < m ■ mmm m Mm-' * ' •“ "~ 

p5iz»r^3*i 


I niMPkMI HHMli>«nNMllUM|inMIMmNlM 

I iPiM IBitl *«•«•*»*** NMIUPBlMl— ■BlBB—fSal 

i tssst ussi tins 52335 2222222 225 -tftn sjp *5ES2S* 

HK» ■•••■ 


:ksss 


IIIMPtUlIkkii •••■BMIklMBIk >«■ 

PPPPP T ~ g p|T-fTl 

■kTnPtktwmilllkal Bfa—flPBPB IMiBIRBn(k»R«r iPPkkfkf Mil 
pi kk kM k»P*« *a*««p ■ ■ ikkkikaipauipaiiBiki p*r . „ 9 

m kM ippMM liMkkUPPi mmmnmmwnmmmMmnmnmmm-^m****' a#S 




I ********** pMBPMPPBBPB 
»Pkkk«B*«k IIMtkPPPP PB« 


■ t fl fl— <1 IBM 


if ■■•■BRBBPB MkRffl Brr apkBkpr 




tkUIHIklM«a>Ut«4k 

HCakikMm ?? ? •> H 

• m********* p »— ctPtS yp*pt a 

i miu ■■ ■— KS 23532S 3 

* kPPPP klPMPPPPk MUK ■] 

IkkPIkHlUkkklklkkkl kPkk kP 

■ IkHkkkklk kaPk kBBBil — UMBRPj 

BP— ■■miPUm—BiSt«Mf»BS*j 

a kPkkikkikikkPPPPMPkiBkPik— W 
iuibiihpi ikfai ppbbi ikppk «Hip 
« UkM MlW PMWPRBUPB 1 

i«paii*PWp«*taiiuMkiPB«i 


IHMII 

MMBMH 


URlMMWfi 

::u£S»ss: 


»***■»•■■■*■*••*■ 


BBBIMBBB aBPBBilPPlBfPiPBlPBBPIflRBRBB <■•»• < f 
• u*m>* if—p fiif 41 mt bbipibb ■*» • mm mm* ••* ** « f «■« m i tM ■ m« •* w 

liiftf fv«««i *•*■ *9* PiPPPPP •*»*•■■* «*««•*« ‘ pBii liBPP yMwMBBIf 

■ Mr *4 ***•«••! IPBRUfl 4 pPPPPBPBI|PPPMBPBPBBH«BI IpU—HB 


Ss: 


iassasaassiss ssi ssisa 
:^Bs:ss:gs: ss:::s:8 ss:::i 
KisiHH!is!Hs| 

^HklBBMkPPiKkkBd 

lajaiiM^ 


fpppapi* ■kBiPtUulilkuiiHu 
Mahil kPMtUBHIMBMIWIlkW 
•CfiipiitiPMPPpPMMilfppaM rk» 
kpP pPP M kpMUAp«PIPap(BPPPk wm 
^HMNBHPBBPPPWMklHMUB 
IPlMkk lMI kMklWkpPM *• 


piMPNippppiPBiipppmaiaiikBa# 

kkiMmuuMPikUBMIinmiu 

M ilPPaiMHIk *********** 9 ■■■■pii 
mm ■imiBUiinB«Baan«BBiiBiBii 


UniMlMfll 


ts»: 


■ HkkM BiM » p— 

iilllUIMI fMMf 

!:usn:»es: 

isssRKies: 


mSsu: 


, ■■■■am > t «*« «, ■■■ hhiw ■■,■■■■■«*, 

k “s* siuiss sis sss sss ssmISss »is: sssb 

siarsii’.'SissiSiSsssisssiEsssiSissss 


lijs:: 

fss: 


:ss: 


,”^:ss :3-i 


3 8 


74 


UK utMi iml i»»n— ■■■— IMiKI 

iMitut*ii«aii**M|i(i m*. Mrt i * bb a a bbbbb B aaaaBaaaB aa bbb aiaai HfUdiBi mmmmmmmmm a ■»<■■■••«« 

l«*a»HaiiniiSnamiLiiiHiM bBVBS BB BBB BBI WBB BBBbb bbbbb BBBBBBBBatf BB a a b —B aa bbbbbbbbb* 
■^MaititiaMtuiritfiVT—w'iMnaratiiii '■ H P *> BB ■■■•»■■■• ■■■■■■■■■• 1IH II ■ ■■*■■ bbbbbbbbbb 

•**•*•■««• *bbb* ur £iihi n *T-*i ' *1 **r -**■■*■. r t£a ii mtfi nmMnniiiiiimi bbbbbbbbbb bhibiiiib 
iTIlll'l 1 -*- B 7 .* *- * Mmimir idl^ 3 BmUMIhllBfnMIlllBIIHill niUlWHHBIIBflilllB 
• •'*■ •* i *■■■■ *++ jt* tnjtma mix ■•■miiBmiuBiiifl a— ■■ bbbb b bbbb* ■ ■ ■i imiiw — wbbb bib bbbbb BMf a — H lWIwWW 

BIHB IHH ^T* B'i PUi II Mil III &B BBBBB ■■■*BM5i« 

*>tniM*lB»H ,•** »»M*B- J* m + "*■ V I /f BBB«»*BB m* f BM If ,Xlf* WW* ^irWI*- ft B [_ MF > i 111 lldll HlIBBBIHIlUB *BBBB 
BB*** (BBBlilV^U-IBBl^LTlI^ B BP~-*BBB» B • »■ LB ltallH«Jl r /^ £ r M *. " i—Jt 5 BllltHlllllflBIBlIHlMItni 

U*MM»XIBBBIU *, it r~fl*l .1I *»«|‘ IlMVIlfll B fl H >•»' IIIIIBI. AIlEbB Ik.^.lKvlmillHIIIlBIBfillllllilBI 

MBBHHBH|^H^HHHBBHH^MHHMHHHHBgBHMIIBIIf|l«flfljaBlBBP*«IIPtllll IMII BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB 

EBBBB£BBBBBBBflflBB8*«taB«l«iBee«BBflafefl8B8BBeilBiiBi 
EMMMMMMMMMSBaBBBBBB BBIII BBBBBBBBBBB BBBB 

bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bubm 

• Mb a* J 

:::: 

liB« 

— _ . _ JWC^b^bbbb ^ b mi mmm 

n4lllHIBIIBI«||4MI*M*|lll|Min^HII BBBBB BBBBB 1B| » H BBBBB IBM fc, iMU ••Blllllfl BBBBB B B BB B BIBB! BIB B B H B 

HlllMBHINIMffll IMBIIMMIIflflIIIIM BB ■ aaHaHHHBBBHHHH 

MlBliaiiBBBMMABI* MXIHimiMIfllHBIIflMMHBIIIUMHIIIIMIIIIIBUIIBMi 
MMIIIIMMIII BBBBB WIPIMIB1 BBBBB BIBIIIMIB IMH HUI BI«H IHII Bill! UUI IMI 

■•■BB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB B B B B B BBBB# BBBBB BBBB* BBBBB *BB*E BBBBB MBB| BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB MMC4 
tlBlBIBflfliBXMMlflillllHBXJIBflBlllflll HIM BIBB* BBBBBBBBBB B BUBIBBIBI I4MBHW 
*•■■■•■■■» ■*-*** BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB IMI IB IHBI BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBW 

»WB*BIBIB IftlM l lll lMM H»lH BBBBBBBBBB ■!■■■ BB I BB MIIIMMMHHBBHMMHIB 

IPII.MiliUBHMXi iPM*«M«a!l fXH IIIPHllll (IMI Bi^BBBBI 

IIIBtPIBBI IMI* *l*n ■•■••••■« tHJJ«MRMIMMIIMt BBBBbBI 

iiiiijiiiii bbbbbbbbii xuaBaaBBiMBCmil iimik 

i ss Sb SSS b rm : ***£! *sssb ssks sz ss* * ???? •**•* 

I - - -IBBBBBri BBBBB BBBBB bTbTbbZbBB BBBBB BBBBB BBbS BBBBB EZbB bZbBBB SSSbbSBS SbbbS BBBB B "SwB ■ BBBB mbbbmmS 

lif:::i:^:::^:::::^n:n:;::r— ^::::::^^:z::^::=^:r:=^r:rr:::ss:::=n^::::=:n:;nn: 

KUiw iiMiMa|| BBBBB BBtBBB m«Z| Sb| bbb^mb^ bbmb bb»b wbwb bmK Sm^^SbE bbS> bbb b > bJbZbSSZXb I 
bbb b b ■B w5wi ra||j n BB i wjjmM m n b£b«SZbbb^^^^ 

I I **♦»* BbTJ* BBBBB BBBBB BB«M BBBBB »•••••*•• »#MI BBBb! BBflBB SlM BBBB * B Mil "mniKS 
1 — H IB —B I IWBIWWI IlM llHBI BXMWH |*MlimiHlllfll«ltHMMIIIWI«Hinill 

BK^Tsn^t^i 

:• , 5 iii?! S SsSSHl 

p^ha,M 

BsSSS 

i |M«IIBB»M>Mn*P«lB«MPt<niP«*MlllMI>IIIMll*MIBIBIXBBMMIIIIIMII*« a *tBl 4BBBIBB *• IBBbB lXa| fli 1 1 B I kill 

i mi 'iilllliinn rurnnnimn-nr ■■■■—■■ ■■timm mnrmnnnim nrnn-i~rr ^«bi /bbbbbb ib bbbbb bbbb b ■ bbuibbii BUfiiaMiMM IN lHVliviP* 1 

IM«M BIB BBBBBB I BBBB a BBB ■IBIIBI B BB BB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BB BBB BBBBB BBW 1 T ilBBIBF BB B« ■■■ IBBB ■■ ■■— HM| BBBBB BBBBB » WMBMi UMaBaMBl 
IJMIMItlllll BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BB BI IBMIlMllt jBI MMBI BBBBB BBBB B B BBBB B^MB BBBBB BBBBB B£^^^BjW^Jggg|] 

; 5 a: lisssHisi ■ ‘1; if , kISs :::: rs: sisss HHi : *»* £“> ias.vK^I 

BBB BBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBI IBBBB BBBB B IBBIB I BBBB Bill I B*BB B*BB ► • BBBBB t BBI BBBB | IBB BB I B BBB . I. ‘ flB BBBBl BBBPB I BBBB I BB^BB | BflBr^M I 
B BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB VBl •• VllHVllBlBl BBI BB B • B • B B I IBIBBI i» BBBBB! IBM BBBB a PBB** IMH > llB B B l Wtt gl. BUI L lF^XI I 

I BJ» BBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBI IBBBBBBBMBBIIBB BBBBB IHMBB « BBBBBB MM BBBBl BBB 1 BBI. IBB I I • BBB BB BBBII BBB B I V^BBBB«MII 

l^mB^BSiasiKsaaiKiKSKiiiiiiiaiisagjas^aiiiaitaaaaisaiaaBisaaa^aiWi 

■ bbbbb BBB«« BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB Bbbb BB.BUBBBJI BBBBBB* MMBIIBBM ■# UIUBB p tlB|B||| BBBBB BBBB* BBBBB fiiflB* BBBBB BB i ia BBBBB WM lMiij| 

^:aaas^:^fflBig::;ar4i^iaffi^^.Tgayrj;Ka:i:aKaaagfflagiacsaBaciB« 

«...,i, jBiaiaiiaii^^^ggw^ijcaatawa 

E* * bBB^B BBBBB IMII BBBBB BBB B B I BB1BIIBH BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBF BBBBM 9> W BMMBlBBBIB MIIMCMU f’T-'J BEg^gg* «•**** .1 

IZbBB BB wjj BB t aBBBBBB bSbBB BbSb* EXbBBBBBBB MMI BBBBB SiSSS" flSSp { ^BaBBBBBBBPBBBBBBB»BaBBBBBB 

■BBBlMBBt BBUBBB iMlS? > BB BBBBBlMtB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB B BB BB BB BBB ^ WB l Bi B jBBBBBB BJWBBgBBBB IM I I BBBBB 

B B BBB BB Bmt BBBBBB B BBBBBBB BB B IB BBBB B BBBBB BBBBB BBBM BBBBB BBBBB ■ 

HllllMMt*»«W*UWMIHBIIIWIIIIIHIIIIIBIII|N|l BBBBB I a —BBBBBB — BBBBBBB BBBBBB BBBBB B BBBB IBIB BBBBBB. 

— *« ■ I a III BBBBB IB BMIBIBBlIlflllltM BBBDIB|fll BBB BBI 

HIMaaBlIIIIIMIIt MMPPma BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BB— I B B B B BB 1 |PB BBBBB «■ BBB BBBB BlIftlllllB BBBB B —B B IP BBBBl 
a*a*fBBPMM>li*BB « l ■■■■BB W MBB IBBWB WWa WfBBBi lBB W I l MM B ^ BB BB BB* BBBBB BBB B B BBBBBBB * »B B B BBBBBBBlftBB Bl II 

BBC BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBB BBB BBBBbSbbbS BBB? Zaaiji? r*BB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB MB BlS IMI BB* 

MIXPWHWpfrl a »a» il— BB BBBBBBBBBB BBBB* BB*b*Bb«B*V *BBBBBBf I PBBBMIBII BBB ■•■•BBB IPPPPXIPP PPPM BBBBB BBBBB' 

SpbBbbBbSSbmTVm BBBBB BB B BB BB B BB BBBBBBBBBB PBBMP*P«t I UllliW f — BBBBI BBB B BBB M BB BI BBBBB BBBBB mill— BBBBB 

ilininTf p " bbbbb BbBBbbBBBB BBBBB BB M l ipMimmi > ummmmmm 4 4 BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBb IBHBMBBB BBBB-* BBBB* BBB B 0 BBBB B 

PXMHBUM I B I § B— Bl B BB BB BBBBB ■■■■•»■■•« BBBBB BBBBB fBBBBBUr f | BBBBB IBJBBB B B BBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBB ■ BBBBI BBBBB BBBBB 
MIMPMPPM k*f jj— BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB El|l|B|r i f BBBBB B B BB B B B ■•* BBBB* BBBB B B**«B BBBB ■ BBBBB BBBBB I BBBB 
HIM pCx *B B >t ; giy igto*i B**BB bbbbb bbbbb bbbb l IBBBB ay j iBBBBa aaa a a BBMM— BBB B«BB ■ a — — BBBB a BBMia BBBBBBBBBi 

FbSbBBB I* ^BBBBBBBBBB —BBB B B B B B l*WPP W PP B* IBBBB BBBBB BBBB# ■*■■■ * M B B Wffii ^Bff |fff| 99t\ 

BBBBB I BP BMaHMIailMi MIIIIIHIWIHIII BBBBBBBBBB — BfgBiJfBB§i MBg fe44M&f4 

^BOimbbuibbbu |B IBBBB jB» ■■ BB BBB *••*** »B B* B W ■ B B *•*•■ BB B B* BBB BB BBBB* BBB B P •• B • 1 >••<• t B B»| pBBB i ifl 

E Br^ Eiii inmlaaiitiBlMmniBimr B* l*m pm* II aaBliBBBBBK »BB*f BBBB* MlMpHlhH 

E BBF BB BB B BBB BB BBBB B BBBBB BBBBB BBBB*BB> BB B B III *B —B B— BB bBBBB PMM BBB B> «p B IX BBI ■ ■ BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBB BBB B BB B B B BBB B B BBBBBBBBBB BB* W 
Eb^BI BBBBIBIBBBI— IBBBlWHltBMMII IBBBBBBP BB »•• ••■KPpPPl PPa BB B*BB* B B BBB BB BB B B BBB BBBBBB IMPttBB^BBa fBBBf BBBB* BBfBaB »••#• MBn ] 
EwW kkllB Itall MBSI IIBIIIPMI ■■■■*11 tlltatf M *B BBB BBBB8 »»«BB BBB8*B ■■•**«•*****•* IB 1»B»»U-»BB»*BB* iBfrB B BBBBl tl j M IWi 1 

\m C*v^ r .B»BBB H1MIIKBBB BBBBB BbbBbBBBBB B« JBp *B#B rBl — B BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BB B B B B BBBB Bf B BB BBBBB BBI I » BBBBB BBB BB li ftl 1 BjH 1<#H HH 

L «flllRPl«MBinilBllpia ill bbbb l|i BBBBBBB* <<•*■ BBBB* IB B I B BBBBBBB B B » BBBBB BBBIB BBBBB BBBBB BBBUipiij I fWW NWlWW 

E BBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BUM!' •***■< * IB — B«B BB a BBB a — BBBBB* BalBBBIBBBBBBBMBBBBB a ■ aBB ■■■■■>■ BBB aa BBB USB UUI HU 

E BBBBB B PPPTMPPP — M BnBBBBBBB B BB BBB BBi PB*P || B*I BBOX ■■—IlilBM »lllHl B*l ■■■M»BBM>MM »*— > f aa *»IBBIf f* f *f W W WUgM . 

E^Bas8aiiffli;a;i;ai!a;i;tfsai:s;;aBasaaii;niii;::sa:;:::::iasiS!agB;BiiB KP r 
EgcsaigaaiiggigmaaiaKfflgrsiassaiaiiiiaiKWiaiiiKiiiBaaara^ mW M 




illii^ilil 

igBgBgBBSgSBiSSSgi- 

.aa EaSBa&Saa bhM&hi ftSaff— B bbbbbb bbbbb I 



Ipppi i 

MM*a 




S*?55*****?* 

BBpr BB BBBBB r ■ 


BBB tB* BBBBB I 


i asgsui sgiKasi isringsaaaaiSESS 

I BBBB B BBBBB m* BBB BBBBB WW g BBBBB BBBBBBMBB WMBBB 


ij Bjt lSKi 


ess: 




9 BBBBB B BbCZbZbBJ BBB B ■ ■■<■! BM ZS —BBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB B 
B BBBBB BBBBB BBBB BBBBB jBbbbBBB BBB Ba a glM M I BBOBB 1 

■usnssz;S:zfzsris:ss::^::ss«:: 


* BB B BB B 

| fc iii il 


nriissSSH: 

SSS BBBBB bSbbSm jB >■ i "■■? BBBBB BBBB B BBBbI B BB BBBBBB B 8BBB« BB BBB 

SHc-Sas-ESSH 

la* Bj^afcg^taa bbbbb 

MB BBBB* SlHHu! 

•itMIIUBaauBM 
pBBBBB# BBBBB BBBBB 


\msmm 

■gssii 


:sz»! 


[==H: 


\~=z\ 




m 



mmmm\ 


iHHffiM 




St—3 


iml 



Fiftuar 39 




-75- 


X. Standard Test System 
A. Objective 

The objective of this work was to develop and test a hydraulic 
flow system that could generate a uniform laminar flow with a linear 
velocity profile and constant velocity gradient. This system could 
be used as a standard for evaluating and calibrating pulsed ultrasound 
flowmeters and transducers- The system was also to be used to determine 
the characteristics of the sample region. When sampling a linear velocity 
profile the spectrum of the Doppler audio signal provides a measure 
of the true spatial distribution of the sample region. In this case, 
the Doppler frequency is proportional to range and length of the sample 
region is obtained directly from the band width of the audio spectrum. 

B. Design 

An almost linear velocity distribtuion can be generated between 
two concentric cylinders by rotating the outer cylinder at a constant 
rate and holding the inner cylinder stationary. For this case, the 
velocity as a function or radius r is given by 


v(r) = 


u.0+7-) 2 

r i 

f(2+r) 

M r l 


(r- -H 


where r^ is the radius of the inner cylinder, h the distance between 
cylinders and w is the angular velocity of the outer cylinder. Referring 
to Figure 40; for a transducer location at r=r-| having a beam inclined 
at an angle a to a radius vector passing through the transducer, the 
velocity component along the beam at radius r is V(r)cose=V^ where 
cos6=(r.| sina)/r. This is the component of velocity that the PUDVM 
will sense and the corresponding Doppler frequency is 


-76- 


2foV. 


Af = 


Radial position r is related to the distance along the beam R and 
can be determined from the law of cosines. The Doppler velocity 


then becomes 


V D = 


wr-jSina 


1- 


1 


o 


1 


h \2 


0'*r L ) 

r 1 


!+(#-) 2 + 2(~)cosa 

r i ^ 


] 


In order to sense a linear velocity distribution, the Doppler velocity 
should vary directly as range R. The degree to which V D approximates 
a linear function depends on a and the ratio R/r-j. The parameters 
r-j , h/r^ and w only effect the magnitude of V^. Defining the function 


g(TT-.a) as 
r 1 

gfcr-. a) = [1 

r l 


1 

1 + (#-) 2 + 2(^)cosa 

r l M 


■] 


the normalized velocity distribution as a function of normalized range 
is given by plotting g(-— , a) vs. R/r, for various values of a. This 

1 R 

relationship is depicted graphically in Figure 41. Notice that for — > 
0.1 deviations from linearity depend strongly on a. The normalized 
velocity closely approximates a linear distribution for values 
of a about 70°. The deviation from linearity can be determined by 
comparing the actual velocity at any range with the corresponding 
velocity based on a linear distribution where the linear and true 
profiles have the same peak velocities. In general, the maximum 
difference between these two velocities is less than 5% of the peak 
velocity for 60°<a<80°. Hence, to a good approximation, the measured 
velocity profile will appear linear. The above derivation and conclusions 
do not account for finite width of the transducer beam and the errors 



-77- 


tha t may arise. At a given distance from the transducer, a cross 
section of the beam will sense a band of velocities with an average 
equal to the value at the center. Although this effect is not expected 
to introduce significant errors in the velocity estimate, it will 
cause a frequency spreading in the audio signal. This spreading is 
minimized for large values of h/r-j and for samples taken at large R and 
does not depend strongly on a. For h/r-j > .25 the bandwidth of a sample 
region of zero length will be less than 5% of the peak Doppler frequency 

for a transducer with radius .01 r-j. 

A schematic of the flow system is shown in Figure 42. The cylinders 
are made of 1/2" thick aluminum and the outer cylinder is mounted 
on a turntable which is supported by a thrust bearing. The inner 
cylinder is stationary and suspended within the outer cylinder by two 
supports. The turntable is connected to a variable speed dc motor with 
a rubber belt. A transducer and transducer holder are shown in Figure 
43, which also indicates how the transducer is positioned in the flow 
system. The ultrasound beam lies in a horizontal plane. 

C. Results 

Only preliminary measurements of velocity profiles and sample 
volumes have been made using the standard flow system. A detailed 
summary of the effectiveness of this system for calibrating flowmeters 
and determining transducer characteristics will be included in the next 
semiannual report on this project. The working fluid was a water- 
glycerol solution of viscosity .04 dynes- sec/ cm 2 seeded with cellulose 
particles. The Reynolds number based on the gap width and average 
velocity in the gap was less than 2000 thereby assuring laminar flow. A 
velocity profile across part of the gap is shown in Figure 44. The 



-78- 


PUDVM was operated with a burst of 8 cycles (f =7.04 MHz) and a gate 
of 1 ysec. The zero offset on the range axis results from the fact 
that the ultrasound crystal is recessed about 3 mm from the edge of 
the inner cylinder. The range is given in mm from the edge of the 
cylinder. The profile is linear for R < 10 mm but deviates significantly 
from linear for R > 10 mm. The transducer used for this test had a 
diameter of about 1.9 mm and the power of the backscattered signal 
dropped rapidly for R > 10 mm. This could account for the deviation 
in the profile. Additonal tests will be conducted using blood in the 
flow system which should give a stronger signal and improved S/N ratio 
at large R. 

To estimate the length of the sample region, the window or receiver 
gate was positioned within the linear portion/ of the profile and the 
frequency spectrum of the audio signal was measured. Since the frequency 
of the backscattered signal increases linearly with distance from the 
transducer, the frequency spectrum of the return signal, i.e. the power 
spectrum of the Doppler signal as a function of frequency, is equivalent 
to the power of the signal as a function of range. Hence, the plot 
of the frequency spectrum gives the shape of the sample region along the 
beam axis. Figure 45 gives frequency spectra of the Doppler signal for 
various sample gate lengths. Only about 10 db of the audio power spectra 
are shown. For a gate of 1 ysec the bandwidth of the spectrum is about 
725 Hz which corresponds to a sample length of about 3 mm along the 
beam. As the sample gate is increased from .5 ysec to 4 ysec the bandwidth 
of the sample region increases ffom about 700 to 900 Hz. This corres- 
ponds to an increase in the length of the sample region of less than .3 mm 
for each 1 ysec increase in gate time. This estimate of sample length 



-79- 


only includes that portion of the sample region where the power of 
the Doppler signal is more than about 10% of the peak power of the 
return signal. The extent to which the effective sample region is 
broadened by the low power Doppler signals must still be determined. 

Additional studies will be made using this linear profile 
flow system to test the effects of transducer material and backing, gate 
width, burst length and delay on the length of the sample region. 



K»* 5 


1 u a 10 I yj 'ii INCH 

7 X lO INCHES 


46 


KEUPPCl a K*9CR CO. 


■■■bibb imaiiiil aiiciiBaif 




S niamii 

IgSMBIBil 


j ajaiiajpiiaj 


3 E 


iiaftRiKiiBiiaaiaaiitiavniiiMa«iMWBiMa«> 


■■■a pbspP ■■■«■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ Ibibi ■■■■! 


Miiviii 

3 ■■■■■■■■ 


— BK«^jppaBaaa«aii>aiaiiaiiPPpappppaigBMiM J a 


imtiitftii imumi 

£*■■■■■ mmjt 


BiaiiMMiinai 

■taa«aaaaa«aaail 


via 

■itaaaaaaiaiiaaaai 

■MMisBipiPiiiaiaiiBB 
iMataaiaaaiiaiaaiiiaan 

. mmim aaiaaaiaaaaaiiaM wnmm. 

*■■■ •■■■*■■■■■!■■■■ ■■■■■■■■bp B iami ■■■■! ■•■■*«■•! i ■»•■■ RMafl«aaM«ai*a 
llgllggpf illMPflf 1 jfggMMMBlilBPPMlig aM»aaaiaaaillgiP«MigfgffIl 

|MMMMM|MMMiiiiiMMHMMMMM|gaiafiBiaa ■«■•• mmmmm Iiliafaiai 

laaaaaaifl mailiiiaiftBaiiiaii 


«■■■ '-«• iiaiavaiiiaia 

.'■awl frt laBiiAiiiBipS 

pna iaaaaaaawaaaaw 
■■ipaaRiaiaaiiaRBH 


nati ii«n iMiiiiiai iiiii iiiMHHimwi 
■MBiiaBRaiUBRBiamBMIMMIRRRRiaaaiiBfBlllRRIBl 
^■aaMHiiivaaiiMii mmmammmamm 


Mibivi ibibi iiibb ■ ■■■■ iiaiBHiHM anaiiPaaa § «tti« iiibb iiiiinna iiiiiiai 



ia«i ■■■■■■«■■•*«■«■*■■■■■ ■■■H 

iRIiailRIIIIIBV ■■■■■■■■■■■■•■■■111 IIRaaiBBli •••■■■■■■■•■■•■ ■ I I I ■ g ■ ■ ■ | | * I ■ ■ I ■ ■ fl fl | I | «■ BBBBI I || ■■ ■■■■■ BSpll *•■■■■■■■■ 



■■■HHflflHflflflflHflflflflflflflflHflflflflHflflVflflflflflMflVflHflflflflflfl^BiBiiBiiiaBBBacBBRmflflmB 

l»W _ _ 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^HaaBBaBBBBiHHHBiBaRaaiBHBMBiRiiciaiaiiaiiBBfliiBaiaiBaaiiBiaiaBiaiBaaBiiflflB.afla'^BaBBBBiBaaaiBaiMiiflfeiaBiBiBiBBaaBiiaBiaiiiBBiiaM 

■pppaapaaBaapapppppflappBapaap«»«*aaaaaBaBPPPpaaaaapaPPpapaapaBpppppgppap; ■■■■■•■BaiBBiBipaaBiBBBai|BBBB«r* «< ^-.-pi ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■*■ mmummrnmmuu bbbbibbbbi ■■■■■■■»■■ 

llltgPtPppplililiippgppp"««B*»BP»ppp»»ppppippiBPgglPeglPPigppiPgtillgggliiPP9|ppiPii BBPappppiiPBPiBBriP%^i> 'aipagfipBPaaaaaBpppagBaBBipapBpaaaBiiPpgfaaaiaaaMwai 

lltlllBRRI BBBIIIBIII BIBBB 


■ iiiiiiB 

IBIBI BflllP BBBBB BBBBB >• III IB BBB BBBBBlBBBBB llfll ■ BBIbI BBB fll BBBBBBBBBB BBBB* BBBBBBBBBP I 

IBBBB ■■■■■■■ BBI BIBIBIIIBB aBIBIIIBIp PBSBaBIBII BBiBaBIBIB BllflBBIIB IBaBBBBBBBBiaiaMiBBlBilillMiiWBBBBlBRVB BBBBB BBBBB paBIfl BB RBI ■■■■■■■■■1 I 
BPIfl I BBBBB BBaaBIBIBPPBBIB ■■■■■lllia ■■■■■■■■■■ IBPiaillll BBBBB B I ■ 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ *3 ■ I S « I ■ 1 1 PB | ■ IR ■ 8 III I ■ •■ ■ ■ I BIB I * ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ 1 1 f I * PI BI IB ■ 3 1 III BaBII I 




iSilllljjliljilii^ 


■HHflflflflflHWflh ■■■■** bbbbi iibii bibbiibbbibbbbbbbbib imbbiibbb • rub bbbbi ibbbibimi i 

MIPM Bill; llBMBBBBIBBBRilIBBBIlBia MBIB IBBIB IBIBBBBMi III1R BBBBlB 

rriibipIbS bbbbi bbbbIb 

iapfliBBBBl BBBBB feBBBfl BBBBB BBBBI RBVBBBBBBl IMBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBTBBH BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBPBiH 

BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BiBlI BBBBB BlBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBI IBIBBlBaBB^B 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^miBRafltaBkaiflRBIBIBaBaBflfll»BBKIBBBIBBBfllBBfllBIIIRIia«a«Raifll|Bail'.fBBIBB| 

■ IBIlfl ■•!•■ BBBBBBBBBB IBBIB BBBBB BBBBIBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBB iBl'^BBBBl laBmnTTnTnnTTTTnnnTnnTTlTnnVTnTnTITnTTTnTT 
IHliaillll BBBBB BBBBI BBBBB BBBBI BIBaBaBBBQlIBBBBBBBB ■ IBBi BBBBI ^B ■ BBBBI ■■'1*8 IBBBB BBBBI IIBII BBBBBBBBBB BBBBI BBPBI BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB 
|MHMMi|MMMHHMMRiaiaiiiBBiBBBfliaiiiia«aiiiBB^iaaBiiBap.BaaiaiaBBRiPB9iaaa|aBaaRaBBB<iaBBv«iaiiaiiBiaRaBii«iiRiBBBB 
!■■■■« mu •■■■■iikiiaink iiaanaifi ■■■mibiiib 

■muiai^iBai|||MftJ 

WK>IIII »■>■! Iiiik ■■■iniiimiiiiiiii ■■»»! inai P--.IRHH 

|BBaaiaaaa bbbbi iHuatBiiBBBaiiaiBiBiBaiBiaiiiimMnMMMMMMd 

Hill IBIBI 


■BBBMnaaai 


aaaaaaaii 

SSSaaaaa 9 BaaaaiiiPM«a>* 9 BBBB 

BBBBBBBIBBPBflBBflBflB BBBBB BlBBB 


S 8 SSSSSSS 8 SSSS 5 S 5 SSSS 5 SSSS 5 SSSSSSSSSSS 8 : 8 R 8 KK 8 SMi 

llBBaaillf B^^aaMtB 

HM«MMMMMmMMmMM|MBBailia iBBli llll? tilftl llll 

B BBBBB Bll|l F rfB BB BBBBB ^ ]m » x. ‘.si *3 Q w !• .1 « i i iVj «»> tw •• fiw i>4 is :■!. •«. •?>. w s,- :i* «e rc 

tlll«fBBI|||F,aBBIBRIBP.BBBBiaaBB|BBBBillBR|B^,«|iBII|i|BBBBBBB 


IBBBBBBBII 


IPapaaBBBPBapBBBBBPBBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBI BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBBPBBIBBIBBB BHIB BBBBB BUlflf tfllR ■illi^ jiliBIIIBBIIII|IB||#VI^' BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBIBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB 






PBBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBI 
BIBBBBaaBia BBBBB B8B1I BBBBB BBIiaBBIBBaBIBBI 

a EiaBBaBaBi aaaapBBBBa BBBBBBBiBiBBaaaBBBaaii 
a Baa ap la bpi laaaipBBiPBaaaaapBBalBBiafiBPBaii 


HIRBBIMI 

•BBBBIBPa 


S 

■SSSSSSb 


ibbibbbbbpbbbbi^ 


if' Bia 
.liaia 


IIBPB BBBBB BUB 1 BBBBB BBBBB BBBBB8 1 
BBBBB BBBBI BBBBBBBBBB MB BBBBB BIBB I 
■aB|iiRBfliiiiB|iiiRiiaiiaiiaiifii 


BBBBIB BBBII BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBIBOll 
MMMBHM BIBBI BBBBB IBBIB |Mg|g| 

ai«MMflatfff»iiiai*aH 


4PilBBBB^B»*iiBlll»l«8PPgaF- ilBIBB IBBBIBlBlifflfliflPfll 
BBB|SB'’^iiaB«EiBBtBBBBB 9 ,iaaiaaaaiB«8aaaflBi&Bi^ 1 ciHHi 
■B Bi W ^ ■ B « BB BB I E B B B B BB B w „ «| B B B B ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ BBBB BBB B B BF ; BBB BB 111 


■ BBBBBBBBBBBBBIIB pB 1 

!:s:::::ss:r^s! 


a— — — aaJ 


■laaaniiBi 


■BBIPPBIIBPBIBBBIB'BIPBB 


B bibb a a a a 1 1 a a a a a ibbbb i ana a ribbb ■ ■»',,« ibbbb r ^bb« ibbhiibbi fii'^BBBBBi bbbbbbbbbbbbbb^^bPbb 


iBBBBB^BBBBPflBBBBBflBBBBBBBflB 1 


%IIBB|BBII 
BBBBI BBBBBB 


BBBBBBBBBBBBB j^IBBB IBBIB BBBB 

iiiiBaiPBBP^agiaiBiiiBigiBfli' 

BBBBflBflB'^BfiBifiBBBPBa^.tl BBBB 

bibb |a^ami|Bfliia*f < iii Bibb 


bbbbbbbiibbbbbbbibbbbbbbbbp 

aiiVRtiRBBBBfiiiBaiaiflaaiBBi 


BBBIBBBBBB 

SSS 83 &S 5 SB 

iibii ippip 


BBBBBBB M»B| 


Riaaiu^aaiiiBBBBMaaBaiiBaiiaBiiRiiRiiiaivaiiiiiaiiiiHai 


iBpa 

las: 


■ BBBBBBBBBBBB BBB IIBBI BBBBI IM T* BBBBI - dBI t ftMl IIBBI 1'“ -•• I B IB 8 I B 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 1 ■* I 1 1 1 ■ 1 

atiai ■■■iiiaiB' e piia BaiBaippppiiiBpr^BPPfiBBPf 

^^^■■■HiBailBBlBBBBBMBBBB^^BBiaBBBBBBBBa'fBBIBBBBBBBaBBiBBflaF^iaiBaBflatBBBiBBB'^ aisiiiiiiiBjiiaiaiia IBBBB IIBBI BBBBBBaaBI ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■«■■ I 
I BBBBB BBBBI BBBBB B«f j,M BBBB'. BBBBB BBBBBBflBr . ifi B B B S B B B B B B B B B fl ■ B BBBBBBBBBfl BBBBfl Fr.^lBBBBBP B B B I B BBB •« BBIBl BBBBB aBBPBBBBaBBBlia BBBBI BBBBB BBBBB 8BPII I 


BBBBBBBBBB IBBBB BBBBB IBB 

VHfPPiVBa a Si « a a ■ ■ ■ ■ aap Ibibi a aa 

E Mii 9 fcg<Mf 3 aPaPaiip|pp«BPgPiiw 

■BBlfllBBi f BBBBI 111 a IBBBB BBBBB W 
nail ■•«■« iuntf«RR M»i«i«ail 


iIBIBBBBPPBB’ 


IBBBB! 

■BBBBI 


■111 

RIP I 


1 ■■■■!■■■■! im r ' j jlBB F '^BBBBI 
I 5 BBBB BBBBB fr>il W\g B B B B BI 
I IB BBB ■■■■■ r jtmmP -Bp BB ■ B B I 


ii r ,4iaaaiiii 
F>BBaaBBP|a 

ssaisssse^; 


>Pia 

■■■■aiaHHi 

■BB F-ip BBBBB BBBBB 


BP^il BBBBBBBBBfl 

-.■^bbbbbbbBbbf - an 


aBtaaia v'*aaBaaiB 

BaaBBBBB' 4 aiiBBBBflBBBiaaaiBP^«iaas*afl«iiBaiBa'£BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB fsaaaaa*aaaaisaaBBiiBBBiB| 
Bii«vir-aiiiaflifliiaaavlaB>'-iiaaitiaiiaiiii%4iiirii«ifeiaaBaiaiiaiiiitiii««HiffiiaiiBBBB 

Sg^^^^^^^^^mBBBMB^gBBiaBii«BBBBB^^^mMBBB«iiBj^^^^yflBBBgaBBB| BBBBB B JBJRgBBB m » 

HSaa*iaaaai bbibi BaaBaBaaSSH 

SSSSiSSBSSS 8 BBSaSSBSBBBBaSSSS^SSCSSSSSSSSSS|SS 3 ii 

■ibiiibbiii E l bbiibbbb ibibi ibibi iaa*i MBaaaaaBBiaaa^^ 1 

[»tnaiiBnia ) »B-.. J rtr»i»M 


^^■■■■BBBBBBBBa BBBBB ^B BBB FlaBBB BBBP1 BBBlF^aliBaBflBaa BBIBBI bB^^ | B flB ■ IlflaB BBBa I *: -.^BBl'BiaB BBBBBBIIII ailBfl JrBIIB«JriBIBBBBBIBIBBai«Bji BBBaiBBiai B»BllBBBBi I 
■KBBfBBBi«BBB| &BPri«BBBr BBBBB BBBBB ■BB^BBBBBflBBBBBBBBBBBr^BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB'^ J. BBBBBBBBBB iPBBI BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBB* BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB iBBBBBBBB|giBBBBBBB> I 


8 : BBBBB a— — — — — fll 
.HBbBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BBBS 

Biiiafiiaav aammiiiflflflflfli 


B^^aBBBBaBBBiiBB'^tfggiifiBaaBBPBBaBaffaBaaavaiBBaaaaaaB 1 

a 8 E:::: 3 K 83 »:;ssS 3 hs 3 E§ 8 BS&!:: 33 s:«:ssss:s:s 38 s:iiE 


I lSSSSSSS ■'ItfB’ ■■■■•► d |aaiii , ii p-ktifiiiiif.daiaaaikHiaaaMvaaaMaHiBaaiRRBMiikfliiaaMaaPtMaiafPMMkii iaa*iM*aiaaaaaRaaaaafeaaiaaaa|Raa«i BiiB;|Mii|||aiiiiiR 
iBBBBBBr^aF^iaaap- BB9Bap»-'^BBaBaB»aF-«aBapppaiBBBBPBBBBaaaaafiaaaaaaaaaBiaBBBfiaaaaBaaBBiBaaBBBaBB5aBa3r*^^ifiBaB«aaaa9iaBapiaaiiaaaaiBaaaI EaaaBiaaaflfiaSaaaapaB 
lilBBBI^ lfilllf''rfi|BBiaR':^IR lBBBBRl > '-.aBBaBRBaaaiBBaBBaBBBBBBBBaBBBBBBBBBBEBBBBBBBaBBiBBBaBaaBaBBBiiaBai"f pia aiBBIlIBBl BBSBBiaBBBBBBBBBaBlBBBBBBBBBRfl BapaBaaPBB 

■ Rifla.aiiaiBa^iBBBiBiv': rf aiBiaiiiiBaBBBiaiiBBaaBaaaiRBaiBRaaiBRBfliHBfltiRRaBRBaiaaflRiBRiBBBRBBBB» > 'u-*aifliiiaaaaBiNBBiaaaaiitnRaRaMiiBiiaRiai«iRai«aiiRi 


IBBBBB 4 

gaSiBflBBBBBBar jFn3«r.aatga^^aBgaaB«'wp|aHHHHI 


■••■•aaaaaim 


:a:i 

ESI 

lis; 


■taiafan ■^fR'.aaaa^jtBMP-^aRiaaaaaaaai ptvaiRaBat iB 
IpbIbbbb 3 . ^bbf-^b |ap''^aaaaa iaaai aaaaa ibibi ibibi i| 

iaigpaa Kaia ■ aiia 5- * BiaBiag iBBBB&aaaB BiaaiipBaa 

I If! ***',* jaa^ig pia a 8 paaa i igna #bpbb Biaip ■■ paa i mmiWI 

■■ifSiyflnflflHflnflflflM 

|paa«ij 

1198 1 


! 599 " " K EtlSS ■ ■■ ■ * C 9 a M i*BMB*"*"**aaaBaappl 

illiBiPaB|BPllBiBBgigaPBBBPagBBBigPBPPapBB!31 k 

BflPaaBa»aBPBBBBBaaEgaaBaBaB«BaBag5aBBiaiBBiBBBBaal 
aiiaifta BpaBBBBBBB iaBaapBBBiBBBaa BiiBiBBiaaflaaBi I 


SfiSSSSfiSliilSSf ■55519151 55555 S51*il a i a ft*f“* ^rffl’ -B * MWi- *l B J a l B,i * i>MW l 111BB B >> i* ,11 l 1>11, 'B , ! 1 l iiiB ll 1B R ,BBBii paaapaBappaaaaaaaaapaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 
BiiiiBBBBgHgBBSiiailBiiiiBBaflBaaaB paiiaiBPiiiaBBiiaiBS ibbii BBBBi&aaaiaaBBiiBaaaflaaaiiaiBiBaaaEEaaBiaaBflaiBBaSBBBaBBBBBBaaBBiBBaiB bbbbi bbbbbibbbb 
ai8EaBBlBBB|Bi|BBBBaBBPaP > F^"' ^_^ r? BlBBlBPlll BBIB« IBI1IIBBI1 IBIBI BBBBB BBBBI ■■■BBBBBBB ■■BBBBBaBiaaBai BBBBI BBaiailUB ■■■■*■■■■■ IBBH RiBRRBRRIIRRRilRBBBRRBIBB 

—aflflMiflaa^P BBBBB ■!■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■! ■■B|BBBPIlBBBlBBIIBBilBlBBaillllPWBKB#BailllBSi>Hliail«iail|BaiBliBIBBaBS«ai«SB»lll>||lBlBBBBIBail|BlBBiaB«i 


IflBaBaBBaaafl 

i«aaa ibim 


■RaaRaaMRiapiivRi 


^®®as^saaSS»^B a 


laBBBBBaB bbibibbpbI npaif ■■■■ bbbbi ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■*■■■■ 
jigBiaai giiiPj bbbbi igapi B bb S i bbpbb BBB aBBBaapBBBPBaaaaPiBBipSaapBi 
mflflMHfiliiPiBaBBaaaF?i7aipaFBBiiaBBBB.--BB'. ■■*■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■&■& 


a paaa aaaaa aiaaaa 


■■■■■■■BB BBBBB BBBBB 


■ ■■■■■BB »■■! IIBBI 

RMMBlRBMaillia^^^^^H 
ilBII|| «ialBaBB«IIIB |BB 

Bflflfliflpiiii ■■■■■■■■■■■■ 


BBF^B npBPB Fpaa|BBaiB.T~BB' •■■■■■■■■■aBBBBP ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■*■■■! Illli IBBBB ■■■■*■*■■* IIIBaPBPBfl'BBBa ■ ■*■■ 
11* W t HZ* fr 1 -RBBBBB ,a 4B IR •■■■BBBBBBBBBB BBBBB BBBBB BBBBBBBBBB BiBBg BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBB SflBPlBBBB 
ill ivillBJ BTTII ■milRil^l BB RBI ■ ■■IIIBRBBB >■■■■ BBBBB BIBBR ■■■«« ■■BaBBIBaRBBBBBBBBBI RMIRllllRI iBBal BBBB 


^■ibiii^H 

ygSSSiisUsi sssil Sissisiissiisii 

■ ■■IRIRBUaRRBIIfRRIIIlIBBRBIIIIIlIlRai 
■III RRBBBIBIII RIBBB liaRHBBBBB IIBII ■■!■■ 

■ — ■ Wt£ ■■■■■■■■* 


Bill 


i > ; - .j ; , :":-:i||3saaaaaapipiBiliiaaaaiB 


■■■««■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■•■■■■a ■«■■■•■ «■■■■■■■■*■»• ■■■■■■■■■■ 
■■■■■■■ ■■■■ !»»■««■<■»■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■«■■■■■■■■■■■«■■■ >»«■■»■■■■ 


■•••■••■a ■■■■i 

(■■■■■■■■■■■■■iiaaaj !■■«•*■■■&■■■■■■■■•■ •«•■■■■■■■ KataiBaaa; ■■■•■■■■■■ ■■■■••«■•« ■•■■■aaaaa ataaiaaaat 

!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■•■•■■ aaaaa bbbb#bbbb# aaaaa aaaaj aaaaa aaaaa aaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaBaiaaaaaBBaBBaaaaaaaaaa BaaaBBaaaiiaaaaaaBaa aaaaa aaaaa 


■aajgaaaaaaa aaaaa aaaaa aaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 

HmHHaia aaaai aaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaBaaiaaBfiaaaaaaaaaafl— — ijiM— — — — — 

iiiia .aaaaaa n> >(• ' itaaai 


■ aaai 
•a ■« 
■3 BB: 


aaaaaaaaaBBBBaBBBa 


— ™ « m mmmmm w mm mmmmmmm mmmmmmm 

BBBaaaaiapBiaa]RagP*appaBBBBaB ■■■;■«« 
■Big8BBBBBiBBBBSB&aBSB«a«iBaBR5iB3Bil 
iiliiifiiRiiiRiliiiiiiiRiiRRRRiiaaiaii 


ilBBBB IBBBB ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■| 

HflflflflflPBai ItRRMMMUiBflMMa^H^HflflfllflH 
fPPlIPPll 
|pj«i BBpg 




i9iiaaa3i»BaiKafiaaiaaaaBpaaaaa»3a3iBapaaaBB5aaaa ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ aaaaa aaaaaapi 
HiiRimaiRRBBiiiiiiiRiagiiiiiiiiifRfiaiflMHnnflMMHnHflMBflni 

[■«■■ ■■■■• mu ipRiiiiP ■ 3 iippi #pfff3ii*i3 
■ >l !■■■■ lljil ■■■■■■■■■■ IPB BlBPPPj RB BBB 

si 35 S 3 S :: 3 :n:: 3 i;: 3 £ 3 u:HiiW 


IMIllllllll 


BI BBBBI •PBaafeBBB * bbbbibbbbiibbbibbbbb 

iHUMi.lfiPMRBmWMtaaWIMMMMM 


8 »i 










K~E 


10 X 10 TO THE CENTIMETER 46 1510 
le x 2 s cm. nppi m 

KcurreL a esser co. 


iSSSkS!»mSiMUii!SSi»!i»iiMi!<mSSSSii!H»i!iiSiii>aaiaa!t>i*iti^ mu* 

• 

■ ■111 Mill! ■■■■■»!•< I Ill ■■■■ ■■■■■■«■■>■ Ill HI ■■niHiaMMMkl hmiHHH 

liiiiMUMiimiimiiiuikitt ■ a • t ■ a a a ■ ■ a a a at > > at ■ r a r * 

> 

aaaai 5 aMaaaiaaaaa 5 aaaiiaaaa 5 as 55 SiiiSiSSiiii 5 i 55555 ii! 33 » 3 t»ii 3 !! 3 !i!» 33 ; ? • i i * it *'?’ mm ■■■»"■■»» 

iHiMaataailBiii >i'.. * »«»■■■»■ ia: 

Ir * ■- lii'Miiiia^^^MiiMMM 


naiiMaaiaaia 


• »•«»« ipapppppPM** makiiMaaiaaktalM 


■^M!>-'»l!-!l!»»lf»SflS*H«!«>;!!Sf»f*MSf!5MS!!SSi!!Sll!S5SSSSSSS9!S*SS:S£SSSSSSSS!S!SS!!!!::!SS!»!S*!SS 


IB.ir ’ ' W 

■ piiiiiippiiipp bppkppppppppp** ***** •»* !••■■■*■■••* ■■•■■■•■■■■■■waviavv ••••#«r»v7 r ?-?s^v 1* 





mnvwvnwmmvpviviiviivvvivvHVHt »ig«iiiiiiiiiiniMi itiimiiviiBiiiiBiiinnnBM 
iii MvMHniSMnaanmiiiitimtiiiiiiiaiiiMflaaaHaaBiMNBBiaaaBiMaiMiiiiiaiiiiiiiiiaii 




liihoimi* M ****!-•»**»»*■*■■■■»» 
iiiiiHiiiBimf; I' ili it.BiftMiaaiiiaaiiaflflfli 


fea*atpppp*pittp*iipp*iip*« 




a»**fliMMim»»itm«i«aimiiitMi»iMaBBiiMBiaiBiiBBMaiMkai*aiflaaa»BamM 

a «««»■«•»«■***»»•»* •« •»*«■■** liiMHiiiiiiimiiiii ■ PPjapppppppppppPHtPPP 

^^^^^■MMMM||||||||klkaai»i*aiaaii*ii«iiitaaiaaia>iBi«»»*«BiliaiahBkif 
L«i|IIIIBIBIB1IIIIIIBBtl BIIIIIIIIIIM 


>*«ikm»«'»*'**ip*pp*a^p**»**ft»*iiiip* t *•' 

• iiiipiia ■* **■**■■■■»■■»*■■•■■■■■■ 

a jttmasiaaiaaaaaiiaiiB ■■■■■■ 


■■**■*•* 


i*fi*it*ti *#■•* ■• pippppiiiipppppiPpiiiippiibiiiibi *«■■*■*■■* aBaaiBBiBiBBati fet*a« ■ 


s¥^»bh 535M7*ppn»p*^pp**p»pp»»iPPP*pp*ppp«**ppp*^*p^S**p**ap*»p«*pp««iMiTp***^**pn 

^^^HMHHMMMr.lt>IIIMIIIHIiaitaiMMM«IIIIIHHIBMUMI)ailHtllllll4|[ 

?-■=== 

»..».Mt»»»nKHn:KaBW 




m «>»*•«« i^iMaaMMfMaaaiaaakaBMaMMBH^^^^^H 


iiiiMimiiiaifMaMaiaaBaaitaiaBiiMtiMaiaiaaiiiaiiiBiiiBaiina imh ttaaaaiMBBBMB mm* 

Mail vipatiaiaiaBiaBiaikiaii ti iiihppiii p a pp ppppippppp**** ****** •••■■■■■■■**P***P*** j**********ii**P*p** ■■■■■■•• ■■■■■■■••*** 

iSSSS 55 •**■■■* ■■■■■■ ■■■■■«•■■ a 55 PPBP**** *•***»*•*■•■ **■*■■■*■***•**■ iiBitim ■■■■■••* ***** »***P|***p 


• IBIIBBBBiaiBMBBllHMlI 






iMkaMMIMaAMaiMBMMMMIBBIIIMM MMMMMM «BI ll«BBBBMMBk« IMIlllBIBBIMIIIflMIIII 0 

IMigBiiaiiaBaBiaBiaitBaoiiBiBiBBaiaia B«iiiitaMMtMiaiiiiiMaaiitiiiiMii*iiiifiBBiiBMii*Mi--~‘ 


«M»BBMaaaBaafaB 


■ «****ii****ii**§**pp*3p*p*p*ppp****»pii«p*ii*********p**p*pp;pp J j 22SES2 M 2 ■!255552555 m25 £22 25521 «*?55 

i MiflBaflBB«itBBafB;BflaBBBaatBti«aaiiiBiaiiBtBaBaBBBiBB»BBiiBaiii«aaiikBBaiiii««Bi*aaBBBiBaaiaa»k«iiaBiaBiiBBiMtaBAMBMiiMiaaaBaBflMBaaABMBBBaaiia»i **•""*■”•»■»»***"*;" 222225522 a 22222 2222222222 i 222 *«* 2 »p 2222 iiiiiiiiiM 

■ an ai ■aaBBBBBVBiiaaaiaaaaaaiflKaaflBaiMai ia*iaaiaBM»»**»a»aaaaitiiiaiiiaiiBMBiMaMiaaiiBaiMiBBaBiiiBBiii*MMM«jji;MJ5»aiaMaijaaiMaiM a 

.= ‘^MimviiaaaiaaaiBMil mummwmmw | 

■ BaB«iiaaiaaBaaiaiiMitiiaaiBMMi>OM«aMaaiitBaiMiiiMaaiaiBiaiaaafi«aaaaaaBiBiM*aMMM*MM«MMMiaiiMba»«;;M 


■■ I 

BM!«Mii»MMMM«M»ii»MiMaaaanaBMMa|a*ittatiaaMBnnii»itnnMaaiilMM^ 

b ■■ ■■■■■■ ■( ii laiaiiitBiiia aiaiaaiinati iiBaiaBiiiaiiiaiaBBakaiiaiMaiaaMaMBiaiaaiiaaiiiMaaMaikaaMBaaBaa aaiiaaiaaikia **■»»***•****■***•#***••■■••*»*■■■*■■•••* *■ 






H Baiaraiia* i«n*M aMapl*«a« llaMMl 
akaitiiM: liaim ■iiiiiaiaMaaiiiai 
■ aSii«iixjiB*«Bii BiaaaiaaMMiaaaaa 

A 


MllllllMalMIM 

mtaniiiiMiaii 

aaaaaaiaaaiaaiaaa||ia 


::: 


MMMaaaaiiaiaaiaiaaaaiaM 

■ •iiiiaiiMiMiiiiiiiiiii*iiiiiM | tit MaaabamiiaiaaaBBi 


MMMPtlBlliaatMMMliaillMaBlMNiaiaiMtlMlliMMailBMMMMiaaiMlMMIIIMMialllMI 


S?i! 5 £!*■• !! 2 ! 552 ! * 2 !?! 2 ! !"; 222 ! 2 * 2 !! 22 222222 2222222522 52222 I 2222 IZI 2 I 


iiaaaaamimMiiaaaaBBiaaBaaaiiaiiiMaM 


iMMMi«iiliainaaii 


imimimbi 


aaaaiMifaaMMMi Mi«aaiaaaiaaaaaiaiiiMaiiiiitii**MMiMjMM»aiMiMBiBi«iiMBMM-j 

a«p«i bi*«*pi»**p«* a* at a *i*«* 


«••■***•*> JlaiaakllaaBBjaMi »*»iliiaBaa»iaBitaiMiaiiili«iiaiaiiia»B»i»*t*»iiM*Baaaai»a*iB*aaiiM*a*iaa»aaiiiii4ajiiiMiaaiaaaaaiiiMaijiiaiia*ii»iiiiiii..w........*rF--.j-»jjj^^ naiaii 


iiaaiaiaaaaaaMiaf 


tiftaaiaaiti 


iaa«aaBBaiiaaitiaiaai»» I 


iiiiMikMMiPMMMMiMiiaiiiiial naaBaaiMl 


■ lalatitkll iBBii IMBIM 


iaaaaiiBiai»aiiiiiiilaaMaai»ii 


Ham tMa*»aa*aa«MMaaaMMi«iai>ata 






MMtIMMIMai 


■ ktaiiiuittiiiiiiiiait 


jaiB*»»iii<iiM#aBaiii*aiM;aaaiaBaiMiM I 
Ba«aM>p*4»tMaaaaaMaaiiiiiaaaaPMiMiM| 

l»»p«aaaMik#ai**i*alPtM*tPM«P*aaaaaiMl 



H Ci ure e tfw 



FiaoiLf: <45 


K ,.^ 10 X !D TO THE CENTIMETER 461510 

w £m 10 X 23 CM, *»»I IN u.s.A. 

KEUFFEL * ESSER CO. 


- 86 - 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

1. Interim Report, "Transcutaneous Measurement of Volume Blood Flows," 
prepared for NASA-Ames Research Center under NASA Grant NSG-7009, 
August 1 , 1974. 

2. Schlichting, H., "Boundary Layer Theory," McGraw-Hill, 1968. 



-87- 


Appendix I 

FFT PROGRAM TO ANALYZE ULTRASONIC PULSED DOPPLER AUDIO OUTPUT 

The purpose of the program is to perform a frequency analysis on the 
Doppler shifted audio signal and to thereby provide values indicating 
the variation of blood velocity with time. 

The audio signal is divided into short time intervals and each 
interval is analyzed using a discrete Fourier transform, the transform 
is then used to calculate the power spectrum for the interval, i.e. the 
amount of power inthe signal at each frequency. A method is then used 
to select the frequency "most representative" of the interval and from 
this frequency a velocity can be caluclated using the relation: 

V = ^ 

2fo COS a 

where c represents speed of sound in blood, fo is the ultrasound 
frequency emitted, a is the angle between the ultrasound source and 
the direction of blood flow, Af is the Doppler frequency and V 
is the velocity. Once the velocity has been obtained for each interval, 
the time varying velocity can be constructed for a 1 second interval. 

Program Structure 

Input to the program consists of digital data on tape obtained by 
digitizing the pulsed Doppler audio signal. At present the analog 
signal is digitized using a sample rate of 25.6 kHz. This will 
provide sufficient information to Fourier transform a signal up to 
12.8 kHz, much greater than the expected Doppler shift. 

The input physical record is 256 words long, each word containing data 
values in packed format. Thus, each physical record represents 1280 
data points. 



- 88 - 


Program output is a series of microfilm plots of power spectra for 
each interval analyzed and time varying velocities for each second 
of time. 1 

Analysis 

The audio signal is treated in lengths of one. second, and at present 
is divided into intervals in 1 /100th second. The frequency resolution 
of the Fourier analysis increases with the length of time interval, 
thus long intervals are desirable. However, with long intervals, time 
resolution suffers and information about a rapidly varying signal will 
be lost so that for this consideration short time intervals are preferable. 
A method is used which attempts to combine these approaches, in the hope 
of gaining the advantage of both. 

The data invervals of 1/1 00th second are analyzed in pairs, equivalent 
to a time interval of 1 /50th of a second. Subsequent pairs are formed 
from the last member of the preceding pair and the data interval 
following it. Thus a frequency resolution of 50 Hz is obtained and 
the analysis is performed every 1/1 00th of a second and time resolution 
is preserved. Each 1 /50th of a second interval is transformed using 
the fast Fourier transform, the square of the transform gives the power 
at each frequency. 

The problem now is to select the frequency considered to best represent 
the power spectrum. The method used is to calculate an average frequency 
according to the formula: 

_ 1 pifi where Pi is the power 

f = and fj -j s frequency 

z Pi 

In order to limit the effect of noise on this computation, it is repeated, 
using only the portion of the. spectrum lying within ± 1.25 kHz. This 
is in effect a filter or data window. 



- 89 - 



Its effect is to "stretch" the resulting frequencies along the y 
axis such that peak velocities are high and low velocities near 
zero. 

At present three velocity plots are made using frequency of peak 
power for each interval, average power and average filtered power. 

In addition, there is a printout giving the actual value of the 
frequency for each interval using these three methods. 



-90- 


APPENDIX II 

HEMODYNAMIC PATTERNS IN CORONARY ARTERIES 

by 

M. K. Wells* 

D. C. Winter** 

T. C.' McCarthy'*' 

A. W. Nelson 

ABSTRACT 

A pulsed ultrasound Doppler velocity meter has been used to map 
the time varying velocity waveforms in the exposed left coronary arter- 
ies of anesthetized ponies. Velocity measurements were made without 
invading the vessels or disturbing the hemodynamic patterns. Typical 
recordings of velocity waveforms and calculated velocity profiles In 
the main, descending and circumflex branches are presented. Marked local 
velocity fluctuations were measured in the major coronary branches and 
appear to result from longitudinal vibrations of the vessels. In general 
the coronary flows are characterized by peak Reynolds numbers of 300 to 
600 and maximum shear rates of 400 to 600 sec 


* Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering. 

** Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 
t Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Clinical Sciences, 
tt Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences. 

Colorado State University 
Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 



- 91 - 


HEMODYNAMIC PATTERNS IN CORONARY ARTERIES 


INTRODUCTION 

The hydrodynamic events of blood flow appear to have a strong influence 
on the development and distribution of arterial disease. Fry [1]* and Caro 
et al . [2] have suggested relationships between arterial wall shear stress 
and the development of atherosclerosis although the exact role of the shear- 
ing stress in the disease process (i.e., whether it is a causative or con- 
trolling factor in atherogenesis) has not been resolved. The frequent 
involvement of the left coronary artery and its branches in atherosclerosis 
necessitates a complete description of the normal hemodynamic patterns in 
these vessels in order to understand the role of fluid mechanics In athero- 
genesis. In particular, local blood velocity gradients, especially near 
/ 

the vessel walls, may be most significant in governing the disease process. 
Indeed, the behavior of the flow near the wall markedly affects the trans- 
port of substances across the endothelium and determines the nature of the 
flow Induced mechanical stresses on the vesselwall. 

In general, arterial blood flow can be described as nonsteady and 
laminar although flow disturbances and turbulence might be expected to 
occur near the entrance to the aorta and in vessels having complex geometry. 
In addition, blood flow is not necessarily unidirectional. Because of the 
pulsatile nature of the heart (pump) and the di stensibility of the vessels, 
flow reversal is typically observed in large arteries and may often be 
accompanied by periods of three dimensional flow. Secondary flows can be 
generated by centrifugal effects and would be expected in the arch of' the 


♦Numbers in brackets designate References at end of paper. 




-92- 


aorta or near arterial branches. Similarity parameters of interest for 
studies of arterial hemodynamics are the Reynolds number Re - UD/v based 
on either the peak or the average forward velocity and the Womersley [3] 
unsteadiness or frequency parameter a = R(uj/v) Js (U = velocity, D ■* 2R = 
vessel di ameterv v-" -kinematic- viscosity -and u> frequency of the flow,. ... ■ 
oscillations). Since the flow is not purely sinusoidal, a represents the 
ratio of the vessel radius to the thickness of the oscillation boundary 
layer associated with each harmonic component of the blood flow pulse. 
Alternatively, taking m equal to the heart rate or fundamental frequency 
of the flow oscillations, a 2 can be interpreted as the ratio of the time 
required for a velocity change to be transported across a vessel by viscous 
transport to the time of one cardiac cycle. In animals these parameters 
may vary rapidly and over a wide range depending upon such factors as the 
physiological condition of the animal or the consequences of surgical pre- 
parations. In general, the maximum Reynolds number is less than 10,000 
and the unsteadiness parameter less than 25. 

Although abundant information is available regarding the fluctuations 
and distribution of volumetric flows in the cardiovascular system, .'our 
understanding of the fluid mechanics of the circulation requires a descrip- 
tion of the velocity distribution patterns and local velocity waveforms 
throughout the arterial system. At present, only two methods have been 
successfully applied for “point" velocity measurements in the arteries of 
living animals: hot-film anemometry [4-7] and pulsed ultrasound Doppler 

techniques [8-10]. To measure blood velocity with an anemometer system a 
hot-film probe is placed directly into the flow stream either by vessel 



- 93 - 


puncture or with the aid of a catheter. Velocity profiles are constructed 
from time varying velocity waveforms obtained at various locations in the 
lumen cross section as the probe is traversed across a- vessel diameter. 

When the hot-film probe is positioned near the vessel wall, the normal 
flow pattern in that region is altered and the corresponding velocity wave- 
forms do not represent those of the undistrubed system. 

The pulsed ultrasound Doppler velocity meter (PUDVM) provides a less 
traumatic measurement of blood velocity than a hot-film anemometer since 
it is possible to monitor velocity waveforms extraluminally or transcutan- 
eously. The PUDVM operates in a radar-like mode which allows measurements 
to be made at specified ranges within a blood vessel. This differs from 
continuous wave (CW) ultrasonic velocity detectors which lack range resolu- 
tion and are used to measure volumetric flow rates. The PUDVM measures the 
average velocity of blood cells in a small volume within a blood vessel by 
sensing the change in frequency of ultrasound scattered by the moving 
particles. Velocity waves from sample volumes located at Increments across 
the vessel lumen are obtained by electronic range gating and velocity pro- 
files at speclfid instants of the cardiac cycle can then be constructed. 

In addition to the fact that this measurement technique is noninvasive in 
the sense that the blood vessel walls remain intact, it has the additional 
advantage of not disrupting the normal blood velocity patterns. The pulsed 
ultrasound flowmeter is suited for measuring velocity distributions in 
arteries as small as 6 or 7 mm in diameter and has been employed in moni 
toring blood velocity waveforms in the canine carotid and femoral arteries 


DO]. 



“94- 


METHODS 


Pulsed Ultrasound Velocity Meter 

The transducers used in this study consist of a small disk of lead 
titanate zirconate (PZT-5) bonded with epoxy to the inner surface of a 
polystyrene holder which is fashioned in the form of a half cuff. The 
circular piezoelectric disk acts as both the emitter and receiver of ultra- 
sound and is mounted such that when the half cuff rests on the surface of 
a blood vessel the crystal is positioned at an oblique angle to the flow. 

The cuffs range in size from 3 to 7 mm diameter and contain crystals of 
1.5 to 2.5 mm diameter. 

The pulsed Doppler velocity detector used In these studies was developed 
by the NASA Ames Research Center and Is based on a design by F. D. McLeod. 

The directional PUDVM generates pulses of 7-8 MHz ultrasound 4, 8, or 16 
cycles in length and at a repetition rate of 13, 26, or 52 kHz. These 
pulses are used to drive the transducer which directs acoustic waves into 
the tissue structure and blood vessels. Echoes from these structures and 
from blood cells are received by the transducer during the interval between 
pulses. The arrival of the backscattered ultrasound at the transducer is 
delayed in time by an amount proportional to the distance between the trans- 
ducer and the scatterer and the frequency of the returning ultrasound Is 
shifted in proportion to the velocity of the blood cells which traverse 
the ultrasound beam. The velocities of the moving targets are calculated 
directly from the Doppler formula: 


V = 


Af C 

2 f cose 


(D 


where V is the target or particle velocity, Af the Doppler frequency shift 



-95- 


of the backscattered ultrasound, f the frequency of the emitted ultra- 
sound, c the speed of sound in blood or tissue and 0 is the angle between 
the ultrasound beam and the target velocity vector. By time or range 
gating the return signal, echoes from targets within specific regions of 
the vessel can be selected for processing. The size qf the sample region 
is determined primarily by the characteristics of the transmitted ultra- 
sound pulse, the transducer radiation pattern, the time over which the re- 
turn signal is observed and the sensitivity of the signal processor. For 
the PUDVM and transducers used in these experiments the effective sample 
region was determined to be about 1 to 1.5 mm in depth while the cross 
sectional area of the sample region is approximately equal to that of the 
piezoelectric crystal [11]. 

The frequency of the backscattered signal received by the transducer 
during the observation period is compared to the frequency of the original 
emitted burst in order to d^ter^ine the Doppler shift or difference fre- 
quency Af. An analog voltage proportional to the Doppler frequency is 
obtained with the aid of a zero crossing detector and serves as a measure 
of the average velocity of the scatterers within the sample volume. Pro- 
cessing the signal in this fashion limits the output frequency response 
of the PUDVM to about 15 Hz, however, the instrument is equally sensitive 
to velocities in the forward and reverse directions. 

Velocity Measurements in Coronary Arteries 

A pulsed Doppler velocity meter was used to monitor blood velocity 
waveforms in the left coronary arteries of 12 ponies of unknown age and 
history. The ponies ranged in weight from about 125 to 250 kg. Anesthesia 



-96- 


was induced and maintained by an intravenous administration of barbltuate 
and positive pressure ventilation was provided throughout the procedure. 

The animals were placed in right lateral recumbancy and the chest was 
entered through a routine left fourth intercostal thoracotomy incision. 

The lungs were retracted from the operating field and the pericardium opened 
with a T-shaped incision. The epicardial fat pad was opened immediately 
over the majo** branches of the left coronary artery which lie in the coro- 
nary groove on the surface of the heart. The main branch of the left 
coronary artery is short and divides within a few millimeters of its origin 
at the root of the aorta into an anterior descending branch (LAD) and a 
circumflex branch. At the bifurcation the LAD branch generally proceeds in 
a straight line from the main branch whereas the circumflex branch joins at 
an angle of about 90 degrees. Segments of the left common coronary artery, 
circumflex branch and descending branch were isolated from the surrounding 
tissue over lengths of 1 to 2 cm to allow for positioning of the flow trans- 
ducers. Measurement sites were 1 pc a ted on the main, circumflex and descend- 
ing branches immediately adjacent to their common junction and on the 

descending branch 2 to 5 cm below the coronary bifurcation. A half cuff 

\ 

was placed on the vessel at the chosen site and secured to the vessel with 
a strip of umbilical tape 5 rren in width. Care was taken not to distort or 
partially occlude the vessel in order that the normal hemodynamic patterns 
would be maintained. Acoustic coupling between the ultrasound transducer 
and the blood vessel was provided by Aqua sonic gel or a small blood clot 
placed between the piezoelectric crystal and the vessel wall. Time vary- 
ing velocity waveforms were measured at increments of .5 to .75 mm along 



-97- 


the path of the ultrasound beam between the near and far walls of the vessel. 
The beam was inclined at an angle of 45 to 60 degrees to the longitudinal 
axis of the artery and the direction of the velocity vector was assumed to 
be parallel to this axis. Eight to twelve sequential velocity waveforms 
were obtained at each range location and a single scan across the vessel 
would require from 2 to 4 minutes to complete. Velocity data and an electro- 
cardiogram were recorded on a strip chart and on magnetic tape for subse- 
quent computer processing and analysis. 

RESULTS 

Figure 1 is a computer plot of one cycle of an average centerline 
velocity waveform obtained in the LAD branch and illustrates the general 
characteristics of a coronary flow or velocity pulse. The beginning of 
the cycle coincides with the R-wave of the electrocardiogram which signifies 
the onset of ventricular contraction. During the first part of the cardiac 

cycle (systole) intramusc'jl^ pressure t.h« contracting left ventricular 

t 

wall increases and causes the peripheral coronary arteries, capillaries 
and veins to close leading to a marked decrease or transient cessation of 
left coronary artery flow. As the heart muscle relaxes and the hydraulic 
impedance of the coronary circuit decreases the blood velocity Increases 
rapidly and the maximum flow generally occurs during the latter portion of 
the heart cycle (diastole). This behavior is evident in the record of 
Figure 1 which shows the-LAD velocity decreasing during systole from an 
initial value of 115 cm/sec to about 20 cm/sec and then rising again to 
about 120 cm/sec during diastole. Based on a vessel diameter at peak for- 
ward flow of 5 inn the maximum Reynolds number for this example is 1500 and 


-98- 


the Womersley unsteadiness parameter for the heart frequency is about 3.5. 

Velocity and flow oscillations in the frequency range* of 5 to 10 Hz 
are often measured during systole and early diastole. It appears that the 
ventricular contractions generate stress waves that propagate through the 
heart muscle (myocardium) and cause the coronary arteries to vibrate. 

These waves are readily observable as they travel across the surface of 
the heart and their intensities can vary markedly. The presence of this 
type of wave is seen on the velocity record in Figure 1 and appears to in- 
duce an oscillation at about 7 Hz on the mean coronary velocity during late 
systole. The low amplitude high frequency fluctuations seen on this veloc- 
ity record (particularly evident during late diastole) are due to statisti- 
cal variations in the output of the zero crossing detector which is used 
to convert the Doppler frequency shift to an analog voltage. The fluctua- 
tions do not represent flow disturbances or turbulance. 

Estimates of the time varying velocity profiles in this same vessel 
are constructed using the average velocity waveform for each range location 
and are shown in Figure 2. Profiles are calculated at 18 equally spaced 
time intervals during the heart cycle and are plotted sequentially with a 
10 cm/sec offset between each profile for the sake of clarity. Figured 
(a) begins at the bottom with the profile for t=o and ends at the top with 

the profile in the cycle having the greatest average forward velocity. 

\ 

Remaining profiles are given sequentially in Figure 2 (b) beginning with 
the uppermost curve. The last profile of the heart cycle is at the bottom 
of Figure 2 (b). In the profile calculations account is made for the trans- 
ducer orientation and the profiles are plotted as a function of distance 


d * « % 



-99- 


from the transducer along a line normal to the vessel axis. The diameter 
of the flow stream can be estimated from the width of a velocity profile, 
however, significant errors may be introduced since the profiles are dis- 
torted near the walls due to the finite sample volume of the PUDVM. In 
order to compare relative vessel size among the animals studied, vessel 
diameters were estimated from the peak forward velocity profile. The dis- 
tance between the intersections with the zero velocity axis of the lines 
tangent to the profile at the points of maximum positive and negative slope 
was taken as the approximate vessel diameter. For the data shown in Figure 
2 the lumen diameter calculated on this basis was 5.0 mm while a direct 
measurement of the vessel yielded a value of about 4 run. The profiles are 
relatively symmetric and well developed and resemble profiles for laminar 
oscillatory flow [3,12]. The profiles are drawn with straight line segments 
connecting the velocity values at adjacent range locations and sharp dips or 
peaks in the curves can result *rom slight variations in heart rate, cardiac 
output or respiration during the time required to complete the vessel scan. 

Figures 3 through 8 illustrate representative velocity waveforms and 
profiles from the main, descending and circumflex branches of the left 
coronary artery of a single pony. These data were obtained over a period 
of about 30 minutes and during this time the pony's heart rate increased 
from 60 beats/min to about 71 beats/min. Velocity waveforms in the main 
branch at 7 equal spaced locations from the center of the vessel to the 
far wall are shown in Figure 3. Again notice the decrease in mean velocity 
during systole followed by a sustained forward velocity during diastole. 

In this example an oscillation of 6 Hz is seen superimposed on the velocity 



- 100 - 


waveforms throughout the heart cycle and is particularly pronounced during 
systole. Velocity profiles corresponding to these waveforms are given in 
Figure 4. Successive profiles are off-set vertically by a distance equiva- 
lent to a velocity increment of 2 cm/sec. From these records it appears 
that the time varying velocity measured during systole at a distance of 
3.1 mm is slightly elevated compared to the velocities at neighboring range 
locations. Most probably, this artifact results from a momentary change in 
cardiac output or arterial pressure or it may be associated with the induced 
vibration of the vessel. 

Velocity patterns from the near wall to the center of the descending 
branch are shown in Figure 5. Generally, the waves are similar in shape 
to waves in the main branch although the average velocities are somewhat 
higher in the LAD because of its smaller diameter. Vessel diameters esti- 
mated from the profiles were 6.4 mm for the main branch and 5.9 mm for the 
descending branch. Profiles for the LAD are plotted in Figure 6. 

The characteristic form of velocity waves in the circumflex branch 
is markedly different from that in the main and LAD branches. Figure 7 
illustrates the average velocity waveforms obtained in a scan of the 
circumflex branch from the near wall to the center of the vessel. Veloc- 
ity fluctuations resulting from the vibratory motion of the vessel are 
again present during systole, however, their magnitudes are less than half 
of the corresponding variations recorded from the main or LAD branch. 
Furthermore these oscillations do not appear on the velocity waveforms 
during diastole. With the exception of a transient cessation of the flow 
at about t=500 msec, the mean forward velocity is about the same in systole 



- 101 - 


and diastole which Is also in contrast to the behavior noted for the other 
two branches. Velocity profiles for the circumflex branch were constructed 
from the measured waveforms and are shown plotted in Figure 8. The vessel 
diameter for this example was estimated from the peak forward profile to 
be 4.2 mm and was directly measured post-mortem as about 2 mm. Since the 
length of the PUDVM sample volume is not small compared to the diameter of 
this circumflex branch, the computed profiles may differ appreciably from 
the true velocity distributions. 


DISCUSSION 

The blood velocity waveforms and profiles described above are repre- 
sentative of the results obtained over the entire course of this study. 
Except for the low frequency systolic fluctuations, the general character- 
istics of the centerline velocities measured with the PUDVM are similar to 
phasic flow waves recorded in the coronary arteries of dogs using electro- 
magnetic or continuous wive Doppler flowmeters [13 -15]. Reynolds numbers 
based on the peak centerline velocity normally ranged from about 300 to 
600 in the major branches of the left coronary circuit although one flow 
was observed for which the peak Reynolds number reached 1500 (cf. Fig. 1). 
The unsteadiness parameter for the heart frequency was usually less than 
4 which indicates that profiles corresponding to the mean phasic velocities 
should be described by well developed boundary layer flows. On the other 
hand, rapidly fluctuating local flows arising from the longitudinal vibra- 
tions of the coronary branches were characterized by a values of 5 to 10 
or more and relatively flat velocity profiles would be expected for these 



- 102 - 


flows. The calculated profiles illustrated above appear to support these 
predictions. In general, the time varying profiles throughout systole 
suggest that a plug-like flow occurs. during the period of most intense 
velocity oscillations whereas more fully developed profiles appear later 
in the flow cycle. 

Velocity disturbances which would be indicative of transition or tur- 
bulent flow cannot be detected on the velocity records because of the 
limited frequency response of the PUDVM. Nerem and Seed [17] measured 
velocities with a hot film anemometer in the ascending aorta of dogs and 
found that flow disturbances generally occurred for values of ot>6 whenever 
the peak Reynolds number exceeded about 150a. Even though the time his- 
tories of the coronary and aortic flow pulse are markedly dissimilar only 
entrance flow exists in either circuit. Furthermore, disturbances created 
during the ejection of blood from the left ventricle could, under the proper 
conditions, be transported into the coronary vessels as well as into the 
aorta. Comparing Nerem's criteria for tne existence of flow disturbances 
with the Reynolds numbers and frequency parameters corresponding to the 
coronary flows described here leads to the conclusion that velocity dis- 
turbances most probably would not be found in the major branches of the 
left coronary artery. 

The most critical question regarding pulsed Doppler velocity measure- 
ments is instrument resolution. Since the PUDVM estimates velocity within 
a finite sample region it is clear that the size of the sample region rela- 
tive to the vessel dimensions ultimately determines the resolution and 
accuracy of the measurements. A velocity profile obtained with the PUDVM 



103- 


is described analytically by a convolution of the sample region with the 
actual velocity distribution [18] . The measured profile is broadened and 
flattened by this convolution process and may also be distorted as a re- 
sult of signal attenuation. In addition, since the PUDVM does not detect 
zero velocity, the effective size of the sample region changes as it is 
scanned across a vessel wall thereby introducing an additional boundary 
error in the velocity estimate. In vessels which are sufficiently large 
compared to the sample function the measured velocity profile may closely 
approximate the true distribution. The NASA-PUDVM was used to estimate the 
velocity profile for fully developed Poiseuille flow (Re - 1500) in a dialy- 
sis tube 7.2 cm in diameter. Figure 9 compares the measured and predicted 
profiles and indicates a slight broadening of the measured profile at the 
far wall. The ultrasound beam passed through the center of the tube and 
was inclined at an angle of 60 degrees to the flow axis. The scan diam- 
eter estimated from the measured profile is in error by about 10%. The 
convolution and boundary arrcrs severely li*it the accuracy of profiles 
measured with the PUDVM in vessels with diameters less than about one-fourth 
the length of the sample function [19]. For the PUDVM used in these studies, 
calculated velocity profiles are expected to differ significantly in shape 
from the true profiles in vessels less than 4 to 6 mm in diameter. 

Although the PUDVM profiles may be distorted, it is possible to properly 
account for the boundary error and compute the true time varying velocity 
gradients at the wall. This calculation requires that one know a prio ri 
the actual location of the wall on the estimated profile and this can be 
obtained, for example, with an ultrasonic pulse-echo imaging system. 


\ 



-104- 


Although the correction factor does depend upon the shape of the sample 
region and the true gradients, the measured profiles, in general, under- 
estimate the velocity gradient at the wall by about one-half. From the 
coronary profiles obtained in ponies the calculated maximum shear rates 
were typically 400 to 600 J . In one instance (Fig. 2) the peak shear rate 
reached about 3000 sec . The corresponding wall shear stresses are well 
below the acute yield stress for endothelial cells of about 380 dynes/cm 2 
suggested by Fry [1], 

Perhaps the most interesting features of the coronary velocity patterns 
reported here are the marked fluctuations which regularly occur during 
systole. Measurements of coronary blood flow in dogs and man using electro- 
magnetic or CW Doppler flowmeters [13-16,20] do not indicate the presence 
of similar oscillations. Furthermore, the horse is not usually used for 
studies of cardiovascular mechanics and there Is no Information In the 
literature pertaining to either normal or abnormal coronary hemodynamic 
patterns in t hi a species. - As sugges ted aLuve, these 5 to 10 Hz velocity 
fluctuations appear to be generated as the artery vibrates along its axis. 
The velocity signal then represents the superposition of the mean coronary 
velocity with a locally induced velocity component associated with the 
motion of the vessel. Relative to the transducer which is fixed to the 
vessel, the induced flow has the characteristics of a piston-driven oscil- 
lating flow in a rigid pipe where the relative velocity at the wall is 
zero and the maximum velocity fluctuations occur in the center of the 
vessel. This behavior is readily apparent from the measured velocity 
waveforms in Figures 3,5, and 7. Momentarily occluding the vessel 



-105- 


i immediately adjacent to the transducer eliminated the induced velocity 
(and the mean velocity also) as would be expected. In this case, the 
vessel and blood must execute essentially the same motion in response to 
the forced oscillation and no relative velocities develop. This situation 
would be similar to a vibrating fluid-filled tube which is closed at both 
ends. Other possible explanations for the genesis of these fluctuations 
such as relative motion between the cuff and the vessel or twisting of 
the flow cuff and vessel cannot be substantiated from the velocity records 
or by direct visual observation. One might speculate that the occurrence 
of these low frequency systolic vibrations is a species dependent phenomena. 
It could be argued that in the dog, for example, analogous stress waves, 
if generated, would be less intense and occur at a higher frequency com- 
pared to the horse because of the dog's higher heart rate and lower cardiac 
output. Furthermore, high frequency vibrations would be more rapidly damped 
and perhaps not easily detected. Preliminary measurements obtained in our 
laboratory of coronary velocity waves in a conscious intact horse also 
indicate the presence of local flow fluctuations in the range of 5 to 10 Hz. 

CONCLUSION 

These results represent a first step toward quantifying the normal 
hemodynamic patterns in coronary arteries. In the equine species, the 
measured velocity waveforms are accented by low frequency fluctuations 
apparently arising from the motion of the myocardial surface. The ampli- 
tude of the induced velocity variation appears to depend upon the orienta- 
tion of the vessel on the heart and may also vary during the cardiac cycle. 



-106- 


The significance of these oscillations relative to the development of 
coronary artery disease or to the perfusion of the myocardium cannot be 
evaluated on the basis of these initial observations. It is clear, how- 
ever, that these unexpected local velocity patterns will greatly influence 
the stability of the flow and the development of secondary and separated 
flows and will have an important bearing on the consequences of cyclic 
hydrodynamic forces. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 

This work was supported by NSF grant GK41009. We acknowledge the 
efforts of Dr. R. E. Daigle in developing the computer data reduction pro- 
gram used in -these studies and thank Dr. J. F. Fessler, Visiting Professor 
at Colorado State University and Professor of Large Animal Clinics at 
Purdue University for his assistance in carrying out the experiments. 



-107- 


REFERENCES 

1 Fry. D. L., "Acute Vascular Endothelial Changes Associated with 
Increased Blood Velocity Gradients," Circulation Research , Vol . zz» 

. 1968, p. 165. 

2. Caro, C. G. , Fitz-Gerald, J. M., and Schroter, R. C. s "Atheroma and 
Arterial Wall Shear: Observation, Correlation and Proposal of a 

Shear Dependent Mass Transfer Mechanism for Atherogenesls , P rocee d- 
ings of the Royal Society of London (B ), Vol. 177, 1971 , p. W* 

3 Womerslev, J. R., "An Elastic Tube Theory of Pulse Transmission and 
Oscillatory Flow in Mammalian Arteries," Wright Air Development Center, 
Technical Report TR 56-614, 1957. 

Ling, S. C., Atabek, H. G., Fry, D. L.. Patel, 0. J. and -Jantckl . J- S.. 
"Application of Heated-Film Velocity and Shear Probes to Hemodynamic 
Studies," Circulation Research , Vol. 23, 1968, p. 789. 

Seed, W. A., and Wood, N. B., "Development and Evaluation of^a Hot- 
Film Velocity Probe for Cardiovascular Studies, Cardiovascular Re 
search , Vol. 4, 1970, p. 253. 

Nerem, R. M., Seed, W. A., and Wood, N. B , s tudy °f 

the Velocity Distribution and Transition to Turbulence in the Aorta, 
' Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Vol. 52, Part 1, 1972, p. 137. 

Clark. C., and Shultz, U. L., "Velocity Distribution in Aortic Flow," 
Cardiovascular Research , Vol . 7 , 1973, p. 601. 


4. 


5. 


6 . 


7. 


9. 


10 . 


8. Baker, D. W. , "Pulsed Ultrasonic uoppier bloou-Flow Sensing," IEEE; 
Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, , Vol. SU-17, 1970, p. 170. 

Peronneau, P., Hinglais, J 4 , Pellet, M,, and Leger, F., “Vel ocl metre 
Sanguin par Effet Doppler a Emission Ultrasonore Pulsee, L _ 0n de 
Flectrigue , Vol. 50, 1970, p. 369. 

Histand M B., Miller, C. W. , and McLeod, F. D., "Transcutaneous 
Measurement of Blood Velocity Profiles and Flow," Cardiovascu l a r 
Research , Vol. 7, 1973, p. 703. 

n Morris R L. Histand, M. B., and Miller, C. W., "The Resolution of 
the Ultrasound Pulsed Doppler for Blood Velocity Measurements, 

Journal of Biomechanics , Vol. 6, 1973, p. 701. 

12. Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory , McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968. 

13 Khouri, E. M. , Gregg, D. E., and Lowensohn, H. S., "Flow in the Major 
Branches of the Left Coronary Artery During Experimental Coronary 
Insufficiency in the Unanesthetized Dog," C j rc u 1 a t i on Re sea rch , Vol. 

23, 1968, p. 99. 



- 1 08 - 


14. Hepps, S. A., Roe, B. B., and Rutkin, B. B., "Coronary Blood Flow 

in the Intact Conscious Dog: Studies with Miniature Electromagnetic 

Flow Transducers," Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery , Vol. 

46, 1963, p. 783. 

15. Elliot, E. C., Khourl, E. M.., Snow, J. A., and Gregg, D. E., "Direct 
Measurement of Coronary Collateral Blood Flow in Conscious Dogs by 
an Electromagnetic Flowmeter," Circulation Research, Vol. 34* 1974, 
p. 374. 

16. Vatner, S. F., Franklin, D., Van Citters, L., and Braunwald, E., 
"Effects of Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation on the Coronary Circula- 
tion of the Conscious Dog," Circulation Research , Vol. 27, 1970, p. 11. 

17. Nerem, R. M. and Seed, W. A., "An In Vivo Study of Aortic Flow Dis- 
turbances," Cardiovascular Researdu VoT. 6, 1972, p. 1. 

18. Jorgensen, J. E., and Garbini, J. L., "An Analytical Procedure of 
Calibration for the Pulsed Ultrasonic Doppler Flow Meter." Journal of 
Fluids Enqineerinq, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 96, Series 1, No. 2, 

vmrpTlst — 

19. Daigle, R. E., McLeod, F. D., Miller, C. W. , Histand, M. B., and Wells, 
M. K., "Transcutaneous Measurement of Volume Blood Flow," Progress 
Report on NASA Grant NSG-7009 prepared for the NASA-Ames Research 
Center, 1974. 

20. Benchemol , A., Stegall, H. F. , and Gartlan, J. L., "New Method to 
Measure Phasic Coronary Blood Velocity In Man," American Heart Journal , 
Vol. 81, No. 1, 1971 . •>. 93 . 



-109- 


CAPTIONS 
Figure 1. 


Figure 2. 


Figure 3. 


Figure 4. 


Figure 5. 


Computer plot of one cycle of the average centerline velocity 
waveform measured in the descending branch of the left coronary 
artery of a pony. The beginning of the cycle coincides with 
the R-wave of the electrocardiogram. 

Calculated time varying velocity profiles in the horse LAD 
coronary artery for 18 equally spaced time Intervals during an 
average heart cycle, (a) The profile for t=0 sec is at the 
bottom and subsequent profiles are plotted sequentially with a 
10 cm/sec offset. The profile in the cycle having the maximum 
average forward velocity is at the top. (b) Remaining profiles 
beginning with the uppermost curve. The final profile of the 
heart cycle is at the bottom. 

Velocity waveforms measured in the main branch of the coronary 
artery from the center of the vessel to the far wall. Near 
wall to centerline velocities were also mapped. Nets the marked 
6 Hz fluctuations during the first half of the cycle which may 
be caused by vibrations of the artery. 

Velocity profiles in the main branch constructed from the wave- 
forms given in Figure 3. Profiles are offset by 2 cm/ sec for 
clarity, (a) Profiles from t=0 to the time of peak forward 
flow, (b) Subsequent profiles from peak forward flow to the 
end of the heart cycle. 

Velocity patterns across the near half of the descending branch 
of the coronary artery. Corresponding velocity profiles are 
shown in Figure 6. 



- 110 - 


Figure 6. (a) and (b). Estimated velocity profiles in the descending 

branch. The profiles during the early part of the cycle appear 
flattened compared to the later profiles which are more fully 
developed. 

Figure 7. Average velocity waveforms in the circumflex branch. The center- 
line velocity oscillations during systole are only about half 
the magnitude of the corresponding variations measured in the 
main and descendina branches. 

Figure 8. (a) and (b). Velocity profiles for the circumflex branch. Due 

to the limited resolution of the PUDVM profiles calculated in 
small vessels will be distorted especially near the walls and 
in regions with high velocity gradients. 

Figure 9. Velocity profile measured with the PUDVM compared to the pre- 
dicted profile for Poiseuille flow in a 7.2 m diameter tube. 

The ultrasound beam was inclined at 60 d«g to the tube axis. 



-m- 



T|*C IN*lLUSCC<*» 


Figure 1 . 



Figure 2 






CENTER to r*B 



TIMC IN mULlSXOHJS \ 


Figure 3. 



(a) 



(b) 


Figure 4 


ttUCIto MCH^CC 


7 







«HDcm m ovstt 







lib 



VLANT OltTAMCI CINtlAUMI |mmJ 


Figure 9